“there is some chance it might be over 90 percent of daily active users.”
I don’t understand what this means? Is he saying that 90% of interactions may be with bots?
That’s how I took it, and if true that’s freaking unbelievable they’ve gotten away with that. Talk about manipulation.
I don’t know about 90%, though nothing would surprise me from that leftist cesspool, but I suspect it’s a high number. When Trump was still on Twitter, every tweet he posted would be inundated with hundreds of vile, mocking leftist replies within seconds of him posting it. Supportive replies from conservatives would be waaaaaaay down the list, to the point where they were virtually invisible to the casual viewer. I never saw a single Trump tweet that didn’t exhibit this phenomenon, even when he tweeted at 3:00am. No matter the time, the obvious leftist bot army would immediately flood the replies. Obviously, computers never sleep.
I saw similar things happen to other prominent conservatives, especially if they were MAGA supporters. I can’t wait to hear leftist commentator heads explode when Twitters anti-American, pro-dem fraud is finally revealed.
If the number of user accounts that are fake bot accounts reaches any significant percentage of the total, Twitter stock will be worthless and Elon will be able to buy it with the loose change in his couch cushions.
i suspect that what he's saying is that the vast majority of folks don't actively comment, or 'like' posts. They may do one or 2 per day. A single bot that is autoliking 10 different posters could easily swamp the interaction of that one person. I wouldn't be surprised if automated 'interactions' were not 50% or more of the total. 90% would certainly not be out of the realm of possibility.