Fox News already got in legal trouble pushing the Mike Lindel, Rudy Giuliani, Sydney Powell and other these past years that all ended up in dead ends.
This story might be true, it might just be money making or attention grabbing ploy.
The 2000 Mules movie by itself is NOT proof. It needs to be vetted by the FBI or if they refuse to investigate .... some other law enforcement agency. This is the next step. Once vetted the media cannot ignore it. Fox doesn’t have the resources to vet this.
Those lucky enough to be in red states need to push their state legislatures to get involved.
We can’t just have one Sherrif in Yuma county investigating this!
The next step is to track these mules to their homes, get a few to confess. This has way more ramifications to the our country that Jan 6th by 1000-fold.
It is proof to any reasonable mind.
It is not proof in a court of law.
Such proof is nearly impossible to obtain in a corrupted system.
Reasonable minds do not need a legal standard of proof to know the system was corrupted and the election stolen.
“The 2000 Mules movie by itself is NOT proof. It needs to be vetted by the FBI or ... some other law enforcement agency…Fox doesn’t have the resources to vet this.“
This is a straw-man argument if ever there was one.
True, 2000 Mules is not proof, but that is no excuse for not covering the story.
Fox News needs not wait for proof, or the results of an FBI investigation before covering allegations that the 2020 election was stolen. The allegations ARE the story - and it is a huge story, because if the allegations are true, this is truly the crime of the century.
Refusal to cover this because it s not yet proven - is totally absurd.
Did they wait for the false allegations against Trump to be proven before covering the story? Hardly.
There have been vetting articles posted here.
I look forward to seeing the movie.