Okay, you made me read that vile article again, just to verify my memory. I remembered correctly: there is no mention of “unprotected” sex in the article. Condoms are only 85% effective. You don’t have to get very far into the pro-abort case before you understand that they consider abortion as an essential backup if birth control fails. They will continue to make that case successfully as long as people think they problem is “sex without a condom” instead of “sex outside a loving, committed marriage”.
Why are people looking at pregnancy as a medical problem that needs to be "solved" with contraception methods and abortion? The female body is DESIGNED to get pregnant as a result of sexual intercourse. Pregnancy is a feature, not a bug.
The problem here is that our culture accepts sexual activity among unmarried people as a right that must not be infringed on in any way. It is a culture that actually frowns on sex in marriage only, marriage between one man and one woman.
Plenty of posts here seem to support the idea of casual, recreational sex between unmarried people and the conceived child is seen as a mistake, an intrusion. "Oh, if only they'd used a condom." "Oh, if only she'd been responsible and been on the Pill."
There was another thread on what "dating" means these days. It's become a degraded activity. Men expect women to automatically be on contraception of some sort.
But there's no mention of her using birth control either.