Filed 04/19/22
also
Techno_Fog
Special Counsel John Durham just provided the FEC reports detailing how the Clinton Campaign and DNC broke election laws in their payments to Fusion GPS.
Read them here:
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-clinton-campaign-is-about-to?s=w
Immunity for a FusionGPS underling to rat out what Sussman did? Kool! It seems Sussman lied to the FBI to say he had information about Trump but not on behalf of any client, but now is claiming attorney-client privilege? So he really had a client? Mmmmkay.....
British ex-spy Christopher Steele created a dossier on then-candidate Donald Trump after being hired by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was itself hired by the Perkins Coie law firm and Marc Elias, the general counsel for Clinton’s campaign.
The judge repeatedly pointed to the difference between hiring a firm to do “fact-checking” versus hiring it to do “opposition research.”
Hillary for America, the DNC, and Perkins argue claims of attorney-client privilege should keep the records concealed and claim Fusion simply provided them legal services.
Durham is insisting those groups played a coordinated role in pushing false collusion claims.
The judge said he didn't doubt Elias’s claims about Fusion being hired to provide legal advice but said that didn’t mean everything Fusion did in 2016 is covered by privilege. The judge said he would review the Joffe records too.
It remains to be seen how the judge will rule on the privilege claims after taking a look at the Alfa Bank-related documents. Thirty are internal Fusion emails, and eight relate to Joffe and Fusion.
I had to read and re-read it again to be sure that I was understanding the arguments presented.
Too bad a couple of these low levelers are accident prone.
Scribd has a paywall but in a nutshell, Durham is compelling Laura Seago’s testimony. She will plead the 5th unless Durham gives her immunity, which he is doing except for perjury, false statements etc. as part of her testimony.
Who is Laura Seago?
Fusion GPS’s “Tech Maven” who knows the details of the crimes against President Donald Trump.
“Fusion GPS employee, Laura Seago ..... has knowledge about the company’s decision to craft fake opposition research against then-candidate Donald Trump.”
https://headlineusa.com/fusion-gpss-tech-maven-may-be-forced-to-testify-in-sussmann-case
The case is Hillary Clinton funded and directed an impeachment OVERTHROW plot of a duly elected President of the United States.
Because HRC, as US Senator of NY, took an Oath of Allegiance to the United States and its Constitution, she is subject to charges ot TREASON for attempting to overthrow a duly elected President.
TREASON carries the death penalty.
Suppose three men rob a bank.
What legal mechanism prevents a prosecutor from compelling testimony from each of them regarding the other two, thereby having two witnesses against each defendant?
The Clinton campaign used a law firm to run a smear job on a political opponent and managed to involve US intelligence and law enforcement to spy on Trump with the deliberate attempt to block anyone from finding out about it because it would theoretically be protected by attorney-client privilege.
These people are diabolical.
However, the discovery of a crime committed by Sussman as an officer of that firm should remove any such protections.