Where does that say how Americans get involved?
***Pretty much the same place it says that INVADING the country is a violation of the agreement. Where does it say that America can’t repel the invader to the original borders as outlined in the agreement?
Send some weapons or deploy troops on the ground and provide air cover?
***Show me where that is explicitly disallowed.
Immediate4 UN Security Council meeting. Those asshats can’t tie their own shoes. Why isn’t the UN intervening with troops on the ground, you know the blue helmet rapist and child molesters?
***That’s a pretty good question.
The UN should be abolished.
***It probably will, due to ineffectuality.
It’s worse than the League of Nations was and if you think the world will ever get nuclear nonproliferation correct you’re dreaming.
***I think the USA can get nuclear nonproliferation correct. The help we’ve been sending seems to have effectively warded off the invader into a reconsideration of the first set of invasion plans. The more we keep it conventional, the less likely the Ukes are pushed into a nuke corner where they feel they need to build nukes to guarantee their own sovereignty in their existential war the way we did.
My concern is the US and F’ any other country until we clean up our mess.
***This thing IS our mess. We signed that document; we accepted those nukes.
What part of “it isn’t happening and we have a proxy war because no amount of propaganda and sob stories is going to make Americans want to see their family members die in another stupid foreign war across the globe” that you don’t seem to understand?
All this posting and name calling you do has changed no minds. The US is a mess and more war dying isn’t going to cut it because those in charge need to get re-elected.
Give it a rest.
You've been told this before, but this is just flat-out incorrect; none of those nukes went to America. They went to Russia, because every single one had originally belonged to the Soviet Union.