Posted on 01/30/2022 10:51:17 AM PST by Enlightened1
It should be automatic death penalty. Vote fraud steals countries.
What about the JJ Abrams “lens flare”?
Not an expert but seems like one test is to compare how many votes were cast for only president. Ifost went to Biden and we’re significantly higher than past years that is some pretty strong evidence
When I see comments like this from "supposed" Republicans, I think there are only 2 possible reasons:
1. They're just part of the globalist uni-party, and really don't care who wins, or
2. The R's cheat, just like the D's cheat, and they're satisfied that contests are decided by who cheats more.
The ONLY candidates I will support are those that will insist upon election INTEGRITY laws, and strong enforcement and punishment for those that violate election laws. Period.
waiting for the one that overturns the 2030 election - holding breath until then.
Opps 2020 election type much, guy?
Amen to that.
2. The R’s cheat, just like the D’s cheat, and they’re satisfied that contests are decided by who cheats more.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
seems like these congressional seats go to the highest bidder wheter dem or repub??
eg:
GA - kemp & raffensperger
AZ - Ducey & AG Brnovich
Rounds prolly bought his was in?
Liz Cheney?
Lens flares are okay if not overused. Pretty much the same rule goes for any FX - keep them rare.
How have they made a difference? Not being contrary, just wondering how they made a change. You could say “they educated”, but how would you quantify that with certainty as having any real world outcome?
I saw a dark film like this on YouTube the night of the election. Had sound. Woman’s voice was telling workers to get rid of ballots from certain precincts. Republican precincts of course. YouTube got rid of the video instead.
Wonderful. Look forward to watching this. Nobody makes political movies with clarity like Dinesh.
Absentee ballots should be permitted but only with a valid reason on why you can't be at the polling place on Election Day.
And how would you quantify with certainty any conservative effort in the media “as having any real world outcome?”
What other conservative effort in the media could be quantified in a way that would please you? What effort that Rush Limbaugh made “could you quantify with certainty a real world outcome?”
“Obama's America, Dinesh’s critical look at President Barack Obama became the second-most-successful political documentary in history”. He has 644,000 followers on YouTube. Rush Limbaugh interviewed and praised him multiple times.
President Trump stuck his neck out to pardon him after his politically motivated conviction after the Obama administration decided to make an example of him. President Trump also praised D’Souza for his efforts. Have you have received similar accolades President Trump? Have you produced an extremely influential political documentary?
And I do mean to be contrary. I find your “questions” to be scantily clad derogatory statements. But thank you for your comments anyway.
bkm
“And how would you quantify with certainty any conservative effort in the media “as having any real world outcome?”
—
Think Geraldo showing the Zapruder film on his TV show in the 70s; it made Congress convene the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations
In a similar vein, Oliver Stone’s “JFK” help bring about the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_John_F._Kennedy_Assassination_Records_Collection_Act_of_1992
The WW3 movie “The Day After had a impact on Reagan, influencing this thinking away from the “winnable nuke war” concept and even more determined to avoid it.
There are a lot of examples of media influencing real life, eg, O’Keefe got ACORN de-funded.
There’s nothing wrong with producing media that entertains or makes people feel good, but has no effect in the real world, but we’re just not talking anything that’s a game changer here.
So, Geraldo and Oliver Stone helped get people more interested in the JFK assassination and our do-nothing legislators did some posturing which accomplished exactly nothing as far as the real-world results go. Have we now found out who stole Kennedy's brain from the heavily guarded remains? Wow what stories! /s And what do they actually quantify, political posturing to appease the masses? Big deal. Your examples tell us a lot more about where you are coming from than anything relevant.
And you believe that President Reagan was heavily influenced by the leftist nuclear war fantasy movie, The Day After? Maybe. He mentioned it in his diary which he knew would eventually be made public. But you do realize that politicians often attribute their decision-making process to factors that in reality had nothing to do with it? There is no way quantify this.
The only example you cite that I can actually go along with at all is O’Keefe and I applaud his ongoing efforts. But what effect did defunding Acorn actually have? The Democrats just diverted funds to other nefarious organizations and people. It taught them how to keep things on the down low better than they had previously. The 2020 election is an extraordinary example of that. There is no way to quantify O’Keefe’s efforts in the way you are suggesting.
I would suggest that both Limbaugh and D’Souza have had far more influence on others than O’Keefe and I doubt that he would object. You seem to be living in a sheltered world where cause and effect are far more closely related than they are in reality. I have heard some tales about a bunny that delivers eggs to children, but I am afraid that the actual reality of the situation might be a little too much for you to handle at this stage in your life.
With deference to your hero influencers Geraldo, Oliver Stone, and the Hollywood group that made the movie, The Day After... President Reagan once said, “There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit.”
The difference here is you’re talking a being impressed because something that has no demonstrable tangible effect made you feel something was done as opposed to real-world accomplishments.
If entertainment makes you feel better about the world, more power to you; that’s what it’s supposed to do.
And what have you shared that is tangible that would shed light on your hostility toward D’Souza’s efforts other than your apparent reliance on Wikipedia? The only thing that your posting history reveals is that the two of us have no “tangible” differences in our political points of view. I have no idea why we are even bickering about anything.
We seemed to be getting along fine at our last family reunion:
What has gone wrong this morning?
This is a textbook example of what is called a "Genetic Fallacy" in logic, i.e. attacking the veracity of an assertion just because of the source. For example, if one were to learn that the earth is round (globe), and not flat, from a comic book (which also has ghosts and goblins and trolls), that does not mean the earth is not round.
One should not dismiss all the contents of a source just because some of it may be shaky. Logicians recognize this as a slippery slope.
Regards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.