Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGurl24
-- Not really. The only thing before the court was whether OSHA could force businesses to mandate a vaccine. --

I'd add "on an emergency temporary basis." That's the "grave danger" level of risk. OSHA regular rules don't require that level of risk.

The same "OSHA mandate" issue can come through the courts again - this time involving District Courts - is OSHA proceeds to implement the rule after the period for public comment.

I understand that the SCOTUS opinion is on a "stay" or "injunction" basis, and too that the opinion reads as though OSHA lacks this power, period. Won't be the first time the government rebooted an arguably incorrect/illegal/unauthorized order against the public in the face of what looks like court opposition. I doubt the court is really opposed. All it is concerned with is institutional legitimacy and maintenance of federal powers.

57 posted on 01/14/2022 6:13:29 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

That’s right. The public comment period is actually still open on that standard rule. That closes on the 19th.

However, it usually takes years to implement a final rule, at which point we should be all past this nonsense.


65 posted on 01/14/2022 6:46:33 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson