Well you have to feel a very small amount for the libtard smallies
They have an incredibly crap case to argue for
There is nowhere in the constitution they can point to that codifies abortion as a right
The unwise latina’s statement means nothing as she isn’t a medical expert and its incredibly unscientific and flat wrong
And in fact I didn’t think a justice hearing the case is supposed to be acting as if shes a lawyer arguing the case
“There is nowhere in the constitution they can point to that codifies abortion as a right.”
THIS is what will lead to the overturn of Roe. I agree life starts at conception, and all the moral arguments, but this is really a matter of a bad court ruling.
When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Roe vs Wade in 1973, they had to come up with something to base their decision. They chose the 14th Amendment and then manufactured a right to privacy from it.
They justified it by coming up with what they called “Emanations from the penumbras,” meaning they manufactured a connection when there was none. It just feels like it should be a right. This should scare everyone, liberal and conservative because it represents a judiciary that is out of control and not representative of the people. Judges rule on the existing law, they don’t write new law. If you don’t like a law you can change it through the legislature, an elected body, not through court rulings of appointed Judges.
Because judicial activism lacks any standards, it cedes unchecked power to judges. Judicial activism is a favorite of the political left and the Democratic Party. Since most of what they want cannot happen through the ballot box, such as the definition of marriage, they overturn the will of the people with Judicial activism.