Posted on 11/27/2021 5:44:02 AM PST by jimjohn
I’m not the one needing references, dunnodino.
YOU’RE the $hot $hill trying to make claim that these $hots aren’t fetal tissue based and that they DON’T alter DNA....to which I provided a source.
No source will ever be good enough for the $hot $hills.
The AHA link DOES prove how dangerous these sham $hots are.....something you and The $hills repeatedly attempt to den, and, drive-by smear.
To quote YOU....”Your post is full of falsehoods. I hope you forgot the /s tag”.
So, post YOUR sources, as a thread.....and, $cram!
Hey stupid, I just got done saying that pic was full of sh*t. Untwist your soiled panties, girl.
What was the purpose of posting this?
I guess all those words you typed are just your way of deflecting, as you are unable to back up your specious claims—got it.
I assume the antivaxxers (who probably didn't even read the article) praising this post are getting masks and putting them on - I mean, if they believe this is authoritative and accurate, that is what they must do per this "eyewitness."
A child sex cult with similar, but on a smaller scale. tp the Epstein/Maxwell child trafficking/elite blackmailing operation.
Did you not hear about this?
#PizzaGateIsReal
There ya go. The shill asks for references, is provided with them, and rejects them because YouTube. You better cite Fauci or the CDC Jane. This one's particular.
#DunnoDino
And you never hear that crook Fauci or any of those other rabid vax-pushers recommending that because there’s no money in it for them.
Bro. Your whole fetal tissue spaz out is deflecting from this thread, which is ultimately about the vax being worthless, fake, and poison.
Captain Diversion strikes again.
#DunnoDinoWentToGradSchool
#StillDumb
Dude. Hearsay is when somebody tells a person something and that person repeats it. Google it.
This ER nurse is eyewitness to the goings on and vax status of every patient in the ER. This is direct testimony. And guess what. This not a court of law. This is the real world.
How do remember to breathe?
I assume the antivaxxers (who probably didn't even read the article) praising this post are getting masks and putting them on - I mean, if they believe this is authoritative and accurate, that is what they must do per this "eyewitness."
The pertinent point is that "Hospitals in the [Buffalo] area are filling up with mostly VACCINATED patients". Who cares what she says about masks and social distancing.
We get that you must protect the vax at all costs, but try to make sense once in a while.
Thanks for the reply. My understanding was that the terror victims were spread among many different community hospitals so as to prevent overcrowding in any one hospital. However, with a normally high occupancy ICU rate,(something I didn’t realize), I do see that even a small number of admissions can make a big difference.
I have seen reports lately of higher than normal ICU occupancy, but with no explanations given as to why. That was actually why I asked the question.
I did some searching, and found that the actual average ICU occupancy rate is just under 80%, still much higher that I would have thought.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC3840149/
The hospital can plausibly deny any blame for the outcome. ("The State made us do that"). And just exactly what does "if needed" mean? That is up to the hospital administrators.
They are colluding with the State to diffuse responsibility, and potential retaliation, for unacceptable policy decisions.
The State has absolutely no legitimate standing to decide where patients should be treated.
Hospitals have no legitimate standing to refuse patients who have declined the mRNA treatment.
“In Colorado, currently at the peak of surge, slightly more than 80% of hospitalized patients are unvaccinated, higher yet in the ICUs.”
I’ve noticed many of your comments like the one above tend to be vague, unspecific, just like the media and similar agenda pushers.
80% of hospitalized patients could be lots of surgeries, all sorts of other truly non covid primary admission patients.
all of colorado or just major hospitals?
higher yet in ICU meaning 81% 82%, 83% 99%?
NOT RELIABLE Source of Information - just some comment by someone using online name of MomMD
Hospitals don’t make money with empty beds.
I’m in Michigan now on vacation and everyone is whining about how bad the state is for covid.
Michigan has 2520 adult ICU beds. 80% capacity is 2016 beds filled on an average day. At 95%, that adds 378 people assuming they are all covid patients. Being in the hospital and in ICU is awful, but that doesn’t seem like an impossible number to treat, assuming the hospitals haven’t fired all of their staff who believes in making informed choices about what is injected into their bodies.
Now, if these hospitals have fired 10-20% of their staff over informed consent, I could easily see how they are overwhelmed. However, there’s a simple solution to that self-inflicted problem
You’re the only one deflecting and distracting, known $hot $hill.
Very typical, and expected.
They trained you in Rules for Radical tactics, but, as we all can see, you FAILED, miserably.
Now, $cram to those threads extolling the wonderful “safe and effective” virtues, of these $hots. Oh, that’s right…you can’t.
I’ve noticed many of your comments like the one above tend to be vague, unspecific, just like the media and similar agenda pushers…
Exactly.
Talk about “hearsay”….THAT post is a classic example.
I’ll take a trusted FReeper’s word over these $hilling FRoctors and $hift working $hot $hills.
More useless words from you, and still no citations. Provide credible references for your two assertions:
1. The vaccinations contain fetal tissue; and,
2. mRNA in the vaccinations “rewrites DNA.”
Good point!
There is no state-wide reporting system in place that would collect such information. And hospitals are extremely reluctant to keep census data that would identify the percentages of "vaccinated" and "unvaccinated" patients in any context.
They do report COVID-19 positive test results as required by the State. That is the only published statistic with any chance of being accurate.
Other statistics are gathered covertly from extremely small sample populations and questionable reliability, or simply made up on the spot to suit a particular agenda. Yeah, "our side" does that too. Caveat Emptor.
It would not be difficult or expensive to collect the necessary data and accurate data would have critical policy implications. The fact that it isn't being done tells me everything important about what is probably in the data that they don't want to collect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.