OSHA Delivers Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

Patriot Post ^ | Oct 14th 2021 | THOMAS GALLATIN

[LastDayz]

“The President cannot “ORDER” or “dictate” to a department to make a rule. That would be a “dictatorship”.”

And to think that Trump was a dictator, according to the libtards.

[TheDon]

If the vaccine works,
then the vaccinated are safe.

If the vaccine doesn’t work,
there’s no reason to take it.

Either way there’s no need to mandate vaccines except to continue the ‘pandemic’ and the emergency powers that come with it.

[ducttape45]

Now the lawsuits can officially start being filed against OSHA and Xiden.

[lastchance]

True. There is a reason why Napoleon did not say “God is on the side of those who have the most reams of paper documenting their legal arguments.”

[Fitzy_888]

There won’t be enough test kits, even if the simplest self administered tests are allowed.

They just suspended the unvaxxed without pay until further notice!

[Fitzy_888]

TITLE 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS

21 U.S. Code § 355 - New drugs

(…)

(i) Exemptions of drugs for research; discretionary and mandatory conditions; direct reports to Secretary

(…)

(4) Regulations under paragraph (1) shall provide that such exemption shall be conditioned upon the manufacturer, or the sponsor of the investigation, requiring that experts using such drugs for investigational purposes certify to such manufacturer or sponsor that they will inform any human beings to whom such drugs, or any controls used in connection therewith, are being administered, or their representatives, that such drugs are being used for investigational purposes and will obtain the consent of such human beings or their representatives, except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings,….

(…)

[ EMPHASIS: “…informed consent…except where it is not feasible, it is contrary to the best interests of such human beings,…” ]

{ ===> They decided informed consent is not in your best interest. }

[9YearLurker]

The available Pfizer jab hasn’t received approval either.

Only EUA jabs are available and it is illegal to coerce people to take such experimental shots.

Not, of course, that our captured judiciary is doing anything about that...

[9YearLurker]

But of course even if a vaxx “works” that doesn’t necessarily make a vaxx “safe”.

[Eagles6]

Yep.

[mewzilla]

That ship sailed January 6.

[Political Junkie Too]

Interesting.

However, that section refers to the administration of an approved drug being given to someone "in their best interests." Think of it as giving a mental health drug to a homeless person who is arrested and brought to a mental institution.

The more relevant section of US Code is 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies:

• (e) Conditions of authorization
  • (1) Unapproved product
    • (A) Required conditions
      • With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Secretary, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances described in subsection (b)(1), shall, for a person who carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued, establish such conditions on an authorization under this section as the Secretary finds necessary or appropriate to protect the public health, including the following:
        • (i)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that health care professionals administering the product are informed—
          • (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
          • (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of the emergency use of the product, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
          • (III) of the alternatives to the product that are available, and of their benefits and risks.
        • (ii)Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—
          • (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
          • (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
          • (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
        • (iii) Appropriate conditions for the monitoring and reporting of adverse events associated with the emergency use of the product.
        • (iv)cFor manufacturers of the product, appropriate conditions concerning recordkeeping and reporting, including records access by the Secretary, with respect to the emergency use of the product.

  ---

Note that this section is for Emergency Use Authorization and includes informed consent and the option to refuse.

I underlined the part about "consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product" because I believe this pertains to the medical "consequences" of not taking the drug. It does NOT give permission to businesses to place "consequences" on employees who don't take the drug. The former gives the recipient the choice, the latter is coercive consent under duress.

-PJ

[WildHighlander57]

Thanks for posting this!!

[Arcadian Empire]

Neither Resident Biden nor OSHA has ANY Constitutional authority to force this on ANY business.