Suppose that the medical Powers That Be suddenly decided to restrict access to pudding cups.
They were pulled from the grocery shelves and required a doctor's prescription to get some (which could cost them their license) - but the pharmacy could ALSO decline to fill the pudding cup prescription.
From what I've read, Ivermectin is less dangerous than Tylenol. They give out Ivermectin like free candy in Africa to illiterate villagers.
I can cross the Mexico border and get Ivermectin over the counter.
Tell me what's wrong with this picture, if you're intellectually honest.
Why not let the rubes "see the Egress"? - let them buy their ineffective drug for ten bucks and then realize that it doesn't work. The cycle is still the same, with an extra step.
Hell, tax them a buck a pill, to capitalize on their rube-ism.
Explain to me where I'm wrong here.
You might be miss understanding my stance or view.
I’m totally for HCQ and Ivermectin treatments WITHOUT AND BEFORE INFECTION. After infection sets in, the game changes.
But, we need good trials and studies.
Posting Twitter junk, memes, charts doesn’t prove anything.
I read your post. You seem reasonable and quite smart.
You must agree that regardless of how one feels about any treatment, good true information, validated, verified studies go a long way.
If there was information out there that proclaimed the Pfizer vaccine cured cancer……..I want solid proof. I want the numbers, I want everything.
Not just a meme or chart someone made up.
So yeah, I think the Doctors need to be Unshackled. Let them treat their patients.
Have a great day.