Me: Never mind QuackWatch. (Although you can see the author of the QuackWatch piece exercised due diligence when investigating and reporting on “Dr.” Young by going to primary resources such as court records — he also provides a list of references and links at the end of the piece.) You can find plenty of other resources on the web that confirm Young is a charlatan with no bona fide credentials and no scientific background, including by his own admission under oath in a court of law.
See NobleFree’s post #97 on this thread:
-
NobleFree: “As part of entering his guilty plea, Young had to state that he has no post high school educational degrees from any accredited schools.
He also stated he was none of the following: a microbiologist, a medical doctor, a hematologist, a naturopathic doctor or a trained scientist.
https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/ph-miracle-author-robert-o-young-sentenced/19346/ “
-
Me: If you go to that link, you will also learn Young has been a poser and a grifter from way back: “Young’s “pH Miracle Retreat” offers nightly rates from $1295 to $2495 per night. The rate includes lodging, meals, supplements, and therapies.”
If you consider this a “fake news site” as well, you can go to the court records and read Young’s own words admitting to his deception and his lack of claimed credentials.
-
Ransomnote: “Anyone daring to speak against the ‘vaccines’ is trashed, threatened, fired, disciplined etc. but that doesn’t stop you people from insisting they are ‘grifters’ gettin’ rich fighting the toxic narrative.”
This argument does not hold up, as Young’s conviction for practising medicine without a license was in 2017, long before anyone ever heard of Covid or vaccines. Furthermore, his history of fraud and quackery goes all the way back to the 1970s when he was arrested for smuggling laetrile. In the 1990s he was convicted of practicing medicine without a license as well. But he never learns his lesson. He was successfully sued in 2018 by a defrauded cancer patient for $108 million:
https://www.latimes.com/la-me-ln-san-diego-ph-miracle-lawsuit-20181102-story.html
Don’t like that “fake news” source? Go to the court records:
https://casetext.com/case/kali-v-young
The thing is, while there may well be legitimate doctors and medical professionals and researchers questioning the vaccines, this guy is a grifter from way back who has jumped on that bandwagon for his 15 minutes of fame (and possibly schemes to increase his fortune — time will tell whether he’s got a plan to administer his baking soda IVs to the gullible again, this time as a “detox” for the vaccine instead of cancer cure). Defending him is not helpful to your cause.
Young has also made the extraordinary claim that “Also found in the Pfizer injection was Trypanosoma cruzi – a parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS.”
First, the assertion that the parasite that causes Chagas Disease is a cause of AIDS is preposterous. By definition, AIDS is caused by the HIV virus. Second, Trypanosoma cruzi parasites, being relatively large critters, are easily seen with an ordinary lab microscope. Curious, isn’t it, that no one else has noticed them? Or even noticed them swimming about in the blood samples of vaccinated people?
Sorry, but it’s up to those who make extraordinary claims to prove them, not up to us skeptics to disprove them.
Finally, from the article you posted:
-
“Dr. Young is a biochemist, microbiologist, and clinical nutritionist. He and his team of scientists have confirmed what the La Quinta Columna researchers found – toxic nanometallic content which are magneticotoxic, cytotoxic and genotoxic to plants, insects, birds, animals and humans – all life on the planet. One of the “vaccines” even contained life-threatening parasites. Taken together, the “vaccine” components – which include graphene oxide among many others and which may be influenced by radiation sources external to us – create a toxic chemical and radiative soup inside our bodies. Anyone who has a Covid injection is seriously putting their lives at risk.”
-
Me: There is ample proof is not a “biochemist, microbiologist, and clinical nutritionist”. He has admitted he is not in courts of law. Is he qualified to “conduct research” given he has no scientific background, and has admitted he has none? Did he and his unnamed “team of scientists” even conduct this research? It has already been proven in court that he did not conduct the nutritional research he claimed to have done and never even acquired the necessary materials and equipment necessary to such research.
Perhaps you agree with the conclusions reached, but would you not be better off using legitimate researchers as your source rather than this guy? Surely some qualified researcher will look into the claims made in the source you posted ref the La Quinta Columna paper and either confirm or deny those claims?
The professor who authored the cited La Quintana Columna paper IS a legitimate researcher, but has stated:
-
“microcopy doesn’t provide conclusive evidence” and that the “analyses in this report are from a single, limited sample.”
“It is therefore necessary to carry out a significant sampling of similar vials to draw conclusions that can be generalized to comparable samples, recording origin, traceability and quality control during conservation and transport prior to analysis,” the document highlights.
The document’s author acknowledges that a vial arrived by “courier” service, but that he doesn’t know its traceability. In addition, he also clarifies that the person who sent him this supposed vial is Ricardo Delgado Martín, who has disseminated anti-vaccine content.”
—
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-grapheneoxide-vaccine/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-do-not-contain-graphene-oxide-idUSL1N2OZ14F
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/there-is-no-conclusive-evidence-that-the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-contains-graphene-oxide/
Now, you may not like the sources above and consider them “fake news” and don’t blame you for being wary, but you might want to at least consider the content. Again, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. You are welcome to take the word of “Dr” Young if you so choose. But don’t expect the rest of to take it with anything but a truckload of salt. It’s not up to us prove such claims false. It’s up to you to provide the proof, if you can, of Dr. Young’s alleged credentials and the validity of his claimed research.
