Not understanding the rush to get an unproven, non-approved experimental injection involving a new technology (mRNA), for something that has a 99% + recovery rate, while wagging one’s finger at those who refuse. All while low-cost therapeutics and prophylaxsis are proven to work (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc).
A critical aspect of the Emergency Use Authorization for vaccines is for there to be no other viable treatments for covid. That is why Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine have been smeared as much as they have. Also include the profit incentive of mass injections vs a less than $1 per pill treatment. The U.S. medical system follows the dollars, not the science.
The mRNA vaccine has killed more people than all previous vaccines combined. The swine flu vaccine was halted in 1976 In 9 states after 3 people died.
This is not a vaccine. The jab using mRNA delivers mRNA in a nano lipid or fat envelope to a cell. It’s a medical device designed to stimulate a cell into becoming a pathogen creator by creating the known to be harmful spike protein.
Vaccine is a defined term in law and under CDC and FDA standards. A vaccine has to stimulate an immunity in the person receiving it. And it must also disrupt transmission.
That’s not what this is. Even the drug manufacturers admit the jab or its mRNA does not stop transmission.
The jab is a treatment, but if it’s discussed as a treatment it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health officials because people would ask what other treatments there are. And alternative treatments would hamper FDA’s ability to issue emergency approval of the jabs.
Defining the narrative with the term vaccine is a sucker punch to open and free discourse. “Vaccine” throws the discussion into one of pro/con vaccine. The jab is a mechanical device in the form of a very small packet of technology inserted into the human system to activate the cell to become a pathogenetic spike protein manufacturing site.
No basis exists to stipulate this is a vaccine. Simply put, this is a chemical pathogen device meant to unleash chemical pathogen production within a cell. It’s a medical device, not a drug. The jab is not a living or biologic system, but rather a physical technology that just happens to come in the size of a molecular package.
Follow the money ....
Gates buys and pushes vaccines
about 30% are hesitant to take the vaccine.
Gates buys a testing company.
CDC now pulls the plug on the current Covid test (which could not distinguish between Covid and Influenza).
Now the government requires the vaccine hesitant to get tested.
.... who makes the money in this scenario?
That was a good read. The only thing I’d add is that it was crucial for the EUA shots to get “vaccine” labeling to trigger liability protection for the makers.
A secular first-world society that believed it had banished the subject of death to the furthest corners of their minds now hears about its possibility, and constantly.
And it is reacting viscerally.
This isn't as much about treating Covid as it is about getting the topic of death off the television screen.
You and I are in 100% agreement. Our kids were trying to persuade us to get the jab. I started really digging into the pros and cons of getting it vs not getting it. We are both very healthy and have lived a healthy lifestyle for years, neither one of us had been sick for years. After consulting with a couple of our doctor friends, we decided that we had about a 99.5% chance of making a full recovery if we caught it. The vaccine, on the other hand, has a lot of unknown risks. For us, not getting the jab was a no-brainer.
Looking deeper, all of the wrong people, including Bill Gates, are pushing the jab. The CDC has consistently lied to us about covid and is aggressively attacking anyone who has a differing opinion.