Well, I know it is out style lately, but I think being factual is important for making an argument in order for it to have credibility. Again, I know that’s out of fashion these days, and apparently it is with you since you believe it is irrelevant. It’s “personal attacks” to simply care about or state the facts. Some on the right continue to become more and more like the Left every single day.
There’s also nothing “scientific” or historically accurate about what he said. Straight out of the gate he recites the bogus nonsense about animal studies. But to you, that apparently doesn’t matter. Narrative above all! If you care about the facts, you are “denying science” - another favorite line previously used by the Left.
You did nothing but flail and attack him while avoiding the scientific studies he gave them.
You haven’t rebutted any of the 22 scientific studies so you didn’t present any factual rebuttal.
When you’ve successfully rebutted those 22 scientific studies at the URL then get back to us, okay?
And you did not prove your statement: “There’s also nothing “scientific” or historically accurate about what he said” as your last post to me was just assertions but no proof.
Not to pick a fight, but where did YOU get the information that he 'isn't what he represented himself as"? This day and age, out of style or not, false innuendo is the rule, not the exception.