MYSTERY: Why Do We Hear NO Riot Background Noise in Video With Capitol Police Speaking?

YouTube ^ | July 27, 2021 | PJ-Comix

[PJ-Comix]

Okay, perhaps there are a few audio engineers out there or Sherlock Holmes types that can solve the mystery of WHY when the (unseen) Capitol Police in the video below are shouting into their communications devices we can hear NO background noise at all despite the fact they were supposedly in the middle of a riot?

VIDEO

[logi_cal869]

That is NOT raw audio of police radio traffic. It is either heavily processed/edited, or fake.

THIS is raw police radio traffic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GvWSgowFDU

[Osage Orange]

Because this is all BS

[Flick Lives]

I think kabuki is normally silent, isn’t it?

—

LOL!

[BiglyCommentary]

Sherlock Holmes - The dog that didn’t bark.

[mo]

no mystery at all....when one realizes its ALL BS

[PJ-Comix]

Mics that are used to capture speaking or singing generally designed to suppress ambient noise. The further the source of noise is from the mic, the less likely the mic is to transfer that sound to the audio processing equipment.

In the Chicago riot police radio of the video posted by logi_cal869 above, the background sound is suppressed but you can still hear it. In the Capitol police video, the background noise is so absent you cant actually hear an echoing effect. Keep in mind that the Capitol police were up close to the supposed rioters.

[21twelve]

That’s the first thing I noticed was the echoing effect.

BTW - at 1:05 they needed to provide the actor with a script in a larger font.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

Maybe it is time we split the country. It's clear we can't live with the left.

Judging from the violence in their cities, they can't even live with each other.

[PJ-Comix]

“Chemical grade fireworks?”

[airborne]

Bookmark

[ScubaDiver]

Do have a specific time-stamp in the video? It’s 6-minutes long and comprised of scores of different clips.

When you’re watching the clips that were produced by body-cams, those clips were more likely to record richer ambient noise because that’s one of the design features of body cams. Body-cams are designed to record what’s going on around the wearer.

The audio clips probably were taken with varying two-way radios. The mics in com gear is less likely to pic up and transmit ambient noise because ambient noise is the enemy of clear communication.

[PJ-Comix]

The mics in com gear is less likely to pic up and transmit ambient noise because ambient noise is the enemy of clear communication.

To the extent that you can hear echoing in the background?

[freeandfreezing]

The videos were produced and/or edited in Hollywood, with Nancy being the writer and producer.

That is why they did not have the hearings in January when everyone's memory was fresh. It took them until now to write up a script, rehearse the lines and crying, and make up the faked materials to show.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

I don’t doubt that at all. I just hope our side has learned its lesson about walking into these democrat traps.

[Guenevere]

Bttt

[PJ-Comix]

BTW, the rioter’s radio when he was talking about the gallows also had that wonderful background noise suppressant to the extent it had the same echoing effect.

[butlerweave]

So now they are going to retroactively add background noise?

Nancy is celebrating with a few extra bottles of Vodka tonight so she’ll have it done tomorrow

[Mathews]

Easily explained: those radios, like those employed by the military and heavy industry (steel, pulp and paper) have noise canceling technology in the mics. I use one everyday. I could be standing right next to a 10 story boiler speaking into my radio, and the person on the other side will hear me 5x5. Loud and clear.

[PJ-Comix]

With an echoing sound in the background? Also the “rioter’s” radio had the same quality.

[Fresh Wind]