[boycott]

It’s called “judge shopping. “ Dems have mastered it.

[Bshaw]

“It’s called “judge shopping. “ Dems have mastered it.”

You can shop the what circuit you file in, but the assignment to judges is supposed to be random.

Anyone who threatens the deep state finds themselves before a Clinton/Obama judge and their process slows to a painful and hideous political crawl. See Michal Flynn.

DC and NY courts are becoming something other than legal proceedings...

[scrabblehack]

What got me was Terri Schiavo’s case - judge said “low probability of success - case not heard.”

So if the judge agrees to hear it, it would seem the defendant is at a disadvantage and isn’t really getting a fair trial.

I suppose that’s for civil cases - maybe they have no choice but to hear the case if it’s a criminal case.

[lepton]

It’s called “judge shopping. “ Dems have mastered it.

---

During the Clinton Administration we found that Clinton Judicial appointees were having regular meetings amongst themselves (excluding even other Democrat appointees), and directly assigning ‘randomly’ cases that came to their court which they wanted to oversee.