Read the whole thing?
Using his logic?
Here is the link in the FR post (a link to his web-site) which claims:
“I recently learned that these vaccines have killed over 25,800 Americans...”
And here is the link to that claim (his own tweet, BTW):
“Up to 25,800 may have been killed by the COVID vaccine. “
So “may” becomes “have”.
There you have it - intellectual dishonesty 101.
Pathetic.
I wish that there was the internet back when polio was a huge problem. Many refused the vaccine, but that vaccine saved a lot of people. No longer a problem. I’m over 70, but so far have not had the vaccine.
I don’t want to start a fight, but your assessment appears to be unfair cherry-picking. Does he over-state his claim in the bits you quote? Yes, and I suspect he would admit to that.
But that’s not central to his presentation, which I would summarize as:
a) There were problems with the vax that were not disclosed to the public (mainly the free S protein), but which were known to the producers and the regulators
b) There is a strong signal that the current crop of vaccines are having an unprecedented level of side effects, some severe.
c) The authorities and gatekeepers of “sane” opinion are ignoring these reports of side effects, refusing to investigate, and respond with derision and attempts to shut down any discussion of the potential problems.
d) A risk-benefit evaluation should be undertaken before low-risk populations (eg teenagers) are offered the vaccine.
I’m not anti-vax, quite the opposite, but this is a serious matter, worthy of serious discussion and investigation. It’s not fake anti-vax trutherism.
As the old saying goes, if you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention!