Sorry, don’t see a “loophole”. Though Leftists no doubt would.
And would have the media behind them.
Then it is we who are not fighting hard enough, if it can be seen that a leftist would see a loophole.
If we can see that a leftist would see it, then why don't we act on it, too, because we know that a leftist would if the roles were reversed?
Why do we always assume the worst case and talk ourselves out of even trying? Is it a case of winning by losing? Is it a case of the pride of taking the high road while losing the war?
My point has always been that we have a 100% chance of losing the fights we don't engage, but nobody knows what might happen if we make it a fight.
Is there a 20th amendment argument to make regarding failure to qualify? Is there an argument to make that failure to qualify is retroactive, because Congress has remedies? Is there an argument to make that states can revoke their certifications if serious crimes are uncovered?
We would never find out if we don't press the attack because we assume failure before even starting. Democrats are never this timid, they always assume success and push and push and push until they achieve it.
-PJ