[Bruce Campbells Chin]

I really hate articles like this. I almost suspect the authors of deliberately leading conservatives down the wrong path. From the excerpt:

66,194 unregistered ballots tallied in just 9 counties. 66,194 ballot voter IDs not found in October registration database.

Given that the two numbers are identical, it's pretty safe to assume they are actually the same ballots. So, the authors count as "unregistered" any I.D's not found in the "October registration database". Fair enough?

The problem is that Michigan permits same day registration, which means that someone could have registered on November 2 or 3 and cast a completely lawful vote. Using the October registration data as proof of fraud is a hole big enough for an entire monster truck rally.

Doesn't mean there wasn't voter fraud demonstrated by some other evidence, but this particular argument is just lazy, and exceedingly crappy. It is exactly the type of thing the left uses to discredit other, more valid complaints about the inherent unreliability of mail-in votes.

I just hate it when we make it easy for them.

[Dr. Franklin]

The problem is that Michigan permits same day registration, which means that someone could have registered on November 2 or 3 and cast a completely lawful vote. Using the October registration data as proof of fraud is a hole big enough for an entire monster truck rally.

Same day registrations, drop boxes, and the ballots counted behind a shield so no one could see while using machines on the Internet. What could possibly be wrong with that? Only a conspiracy theorist would think anything was wrong, and we never have any conspiracies in our history. All of our leaders are just saints going straight to heaven! [sarcasm]

[grundle]

Those are some excellent points that you raised in post 39.