“It seems Hutchinson is trying to claim that the bill hurts parents control of their children’s health care, and sanctity of patient-doctor relationship and inserts government into this role”
A parent and doctor agreeing to mutilate a kid is not a right they possess. There is no “sanctity” in that. Also, as Tucker pointed out, Asa has no problem regulating underage drinking or sex.
So according to Asa, the state can regulate and prohibit a minor’s use of their genitalia, but feels it needs to stand aside respectfully when they decide to chop them off.
And it was obvious Asa lied that no corporate entities weighed in on the issue. he said “No corporations spoke to me about it”. Of course they didn’t, they spoke to their staff who then spoke to him.
You have to learn to read political doublespeak.