I haven’t seen it yet...I’ll check it out...thank you!
It’s long, but a kind of quick read. I skimmed a lot of it, but concentrated on some key points brought up by the defense lawyer forcing the prosecution’s star witnesses to admit that Chauvin was doing what he was trained to do and facing them to admit the situation was much more volatile than the emotion stirrers who disdain 5he police would have us beleive.
Much of it is very well stated, and he really did trap the witnesses and force them to tell the truth objectively. Which I think will go a long ways towards helping the defense.
The analysis by the defense argued much of what i have argued here for a while now. Officers should never let 7p their guard on drugged out large perps, or even smaller peeps, until they can be more properly secured (like into a gurney where they are much less apt to break free suddenly upon waking fro having passed out. The defense made this point excellently and got the prosecution “use of force experts” to admit it. It was really a fantastic point in the questioning, and one I had been arguing g for awhile now, thouhg he did a much better job of explaining it)