Posted on 03/02/2021 6:14:44 AM PST by bitt
This election was never about "rigged voting machines" at all. The fraudulent election was carried out by using machines that ACCURATELY counted many (perhaps millions) of ILLEGAL ballots.
These state "messes" (intentional) altered the outcome of a Federal election. How is that not a Federal problem?
We no longer have a rule of law. It is now whimsical and political.
That China can buy, anyway.
“which meant the “rigging” allegation was easily verified or debunked through hand counts of the paper ballots.“
This is what l know. In Michigan the two places where the hand verification was done hundreds of votes had been switched from Trump to Biden. The rat SOS claimed it was just a “glitch” and of course the news outlets ran with it. Now project this access thousands of machines. I was in IT for over thirty years and that included some coding. No “glitch” can redirect some data entries from one candidate to another. Absolute BS.
I can find no dissent on the supreme Court's website. Does anyone have pointers to them? The last 'opinion related to orders was on 2/22, and referred to the Pennsylvania orders.
It is my understanding of the Constitution that the states are free to conduct their elections without Federal interference up until their results are submitted to Congress at which time the results may be challenged. The Court has hung their collective hats on the interpretation that they have no Constitutional role to play, that it is a political process. Yet, the remedy for corrupt voting, left to Congress, does not account for a corrupt Congress that fails to take action against said corruption resulting in a fraudulent and illegitimate result that challenges the fundamental principle of democracy being the consent of the governed. In essence the Democrats said “we can’t win legally so we will win illegally and see if Republicans have the guts to stop us...and they didn’t.
The Kraken is where it always was but the Supreme Court won't let you see it ou doubtful one.
Why do yo criticize Sidney and let the Supreme's off the hook, they absolutely refuse to let you see the evidence. People assume there is no evidence but there is plenty of evidence that the court simply refuse to look at it or let you see it either.
You’d have to post the details of those examples. My understanding is that the Michigan errors you describe were machine counts where the machines worked fine, but the humans entering the results after the fact made “errors.”
I haven't seen it. If you know where it is, please post that information for me. Thanks.
You have expressed well the core problem.
Which means the battle is local & at the state level.
States that had Republican majhority legislatures need to primary any & all GOP’ers that were weak on this.
Also vote out any & all state judges that ruled against this. No more going to the polls and sleepily casting avote for a state job because its in front of you. If they’re speaking somewhere, challenge them ! Make them convince you they will uphold t he state constitution as well as the federal.
B$ The machines could just as easily be put back into standard mode, hard drives are very easy to replace. They were given more than enough time to clean their tracks.
Uh, because they say it isn't so there.</s>
Right
1,000 ballots are cast in a precinct.
600 are for Trump and 400 are for Biden.
The computer changes 200 of the Biden votes to Trump, and the results are presented as: Biden 600, Trump 400.
1. How is this not totally exposed by a hand recount?
2. How do "machines being put back into standard mode" and "replacing hard drives" do anything to help facilitate the rigging process in this case?
And finally the biggest question of all:
If I am a Democratic operative in this precinct and I have 500 fraudulent Biden ballots to run through the machine to make the final tally 900 Biden/600 Trump, then why the hell do I need to rig the machine at all?
"The Supreme Court refused to secure the integrity of the US elections."
You would not have to replace the HD. You just swap out the rigged code with a sanitized version. It could have been an automated task that ran after the polls closed. No trace, in fact the machines would not even have to be on. It could run as a background “housekeeping task” the computers run all the time and a forensic audit would not find it.
but the humans entering the results after the fact made “errors.”
Wrong, I was here the machines switched votes and it was proven. The Michigan SOS would not call incorrect hand entries “a computer glitch”.
A large scale hand audit was what Trump wanted but could not get. The machines were used to keep Trumps lead small enough for the after hours ballot dumps to over come it.
That Court?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.