I won’t stipulate to the use of the word “riot”, not after nine months of cities on fire, stores looted, people shot, and mobs rampaging causing billions of dollars in damage, which all of our grotesque elites defined as “mostly peaceful protesting”.
Not having it.
And if MAGA decided to riot, it would be blatantly obvious, and not subject to debate. It’s well past time for the “conservative” commentators to stop repeating and amplifying the enemy’s narrative.
“And if MAGA decided to riot, it would be blatantly obvious, and not subject to debate.”
As some talking head mentioned (can’t recall who), the MAGA crowd is a 2nd Amendment crowd, and the majority are gun owners. If they had come to DC that day with ill intentions, they would’ve been armed. If that were so, it would have been more than a simple “riot”.