What has that to do with the question in view, or the incident addressed?
What has that to do with the question in view, or the incident addressed?
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
To show that statements need to be taken in context.
Ted Cruz hits his wife is a fact. Sounds pretty bad. Until it’s followed with the fact that he elbowed his wife accidentally. Most rational people would agree that it would not be fair to state that Ted Cruz hits his wife without stating the other fact that he hit her accidentally. If Ted Cruz is going to throw out verbal bombs at Trump then he needs to state ALL of the facts behind Trumps comments. Given everything we have witnessed over the last four years, on election night, and then in the weeks following the election, Trump has plenty of cause to make the statements he did.
For Cruz to attempt to make it seem like Trump is nuts for making the statements he made with zero cause is just grossly unfair and points to a political weasel reading tea leaves and instead of his wife, this time elbowing Trump.