[imardmd1]

Thanks for this link, I watched it all the way through, I thik rgar Ted Cruz is honest, practical, and not on any kund of an avenue to bring dishonor to the man the he heloed get into office ant to get the needed programs through and installed. Ted Cruz is clearly as oppositional to all the damage that the Democrats are going to try to put into effect to nullify the advances that Cruz and his comrades pit into action.

There seem to be a lot of people on Free Republic who are as dead-set against Cruz as they were when he was running for nomination in the primaries. Furthermore, I have no doubt whatsoever that he would have been as motivated, as energetic, and far more effective than Trump was, and still be in office for four more years, mainly because he can at least control his temper and his mouth.

I am as fully behind Cruz as a conservative non-Deep-State political force as he was when I held for his nomination over four years ago. Watching trough this interview proves it.

Again, thank you for your diligence.

[ruthles]

You are fully behind the declaration by Cruz that there was no voter fraud?
This must be Ted trolling because truly nobody else would defend him.

[Fresh Wind]

Cruz would have lost to Hillary.

[Lurkinanloomin]

He hired Neil Bush as his campaign finance director and chose Carly Fiorina as his running mate, he’s Deep State, he just tries to hide it, like his Canadian citizenship.