Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Onthebrink

I remember the Sovs saying they were going to make it 100 MT, but it was Sahkarov (I think) who suggested that was too big and that they scale it down by half.

I don’t think anyone makes them that big anymore. I know that the biggest we made was 15MT (Castle Bravo), and that was by accident.


2 posted on 01/23/2021 7:38:07 AM PST by hoagy62 (DTCM&OTTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hoagy62

The limiting factor is the delivery system.

100kt seems to be the optimum size.

A 100MT bomb would need a SpaceX super-heavy to lift it.


5 posted on 01/23/2021 7:42:16 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: hoagy62
I remember the Sovs saying they were going to make it 100 MT, but it was Sahkarov (I think) who suggested that was too big and that they scale it down by half.

The Tsar Bomba was designed as a three stage fission-fusion-fission device. The final stage was a depleted uranium tamper and casing. This was replaced with lead to decrease the amount of radioactive fallout. As it turned out, the Tsar Bomba was very "clean."

Removing the third stage reduced the yield from an expected 100 MT to 50 MT. The bomb was an act of political intimidation against the US. It was never meant to be deployed.

26 posted on 01/23/2021 9:33:22 AM PST by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson