Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ETCM
Your right, it's not difficult. Fully explained in #16 above.

States can NOT count, and announce the results of, ballots PAST "election day" as set forth by the Congress.

If that were permissible, then a state could continue counting ballots received a month or more after "election day." It would completely destroy our election process.

It's a slam dunk.

If the defendant states can NOT completely remove the votes counted AFTER "election day" and ONLY report votes tallied as of 11:59 on "election day," then their election results violate federal law & the LOVE 9 - 0 decision.

40 posted on 12/11/2020 1:57:45 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


"11:59"

To be clear, 11:59 PM (or 23:59).

41 posted on 12/11/2020 2:00:21 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid; ETCM

Does etcm’s post #31 change anything?

Does the Foster vs Love decision have any bearing on ballots trucked in at 0-dark-hundred, and related shenanigans?


42 posted on 12/11/2020 2:06:28 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 retusrning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson