Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PIF

I’m assuming that the headline is erroneous. The Pennsylvania lawsuit was filed by Cong. Mike Kelly and two congressional candidates that “lost” because of a massive influx of mail-in ballots, which were authorized by the governor, the secretary of state and the state supreme court without consulting with the legislature - a direct violation of the state and US constitutions.

This is compelling because of the nature of the Pennsylvania lawsuit, which is not fraud-based (i.e., requiring the presentation of evidence), but an issue of constitutionality. Judges, by nature, are reluctant to be the deciding factor in anything that sets precedent or might be contentious. If the Pennsylvania lawsuit is supported by multiple other states, it’s far more likely to get the attention of SCOTUS.

I would add that the lawsuit filed by the State of Texas against Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Michigan could end up being a very big deal as well.


17 posted on 12/08/2020 8:00:51 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ManHunter

“Judges, by nature, are reluctant to be the deciding factor in anything that sets precedent or might be contentious”

Except for all Obama appointed judges and RINO Bush judges that all hate everything that President Trump wants to do...


29 posted on 12/08/2020 8:48:31 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson