Posted on 12/07/2020 12:57:16 PM PST by EyesOfTX
David Blackmon sounds like he’s rubbing his hands in glee at Sydney’s travails.
I used to enjoy reading his articles, but it appears he’s gone Fox on us.
I’m surprised you wrote this. Maybe dismayed is the word I’m looking for.
If my precinct has 1,000 votes cast ... 600 of them are for Trump and 400 of them are for Biden ... and the computer reports that Biden got 600 and Trump got 400 ... a manual recount will show the real result.
And if the extra 200 Trump ballots get “lost” then the count will be 400-400 ... and the computer rigging is completely pointless because it isn’t needed if the intent is to destroy Trump ballots. That would be done before they were even run through the scanner.
I don’t know why so many Freepers are fixated on this idiocy of making something so much more complicated than it needs to be. For that matter, I don’t know why Powell was, either.
Re: “the bombastic attorney”
Uh?....I don’t think she is bombastic.
I usually enjoy David Blackmon’s editorial but, wow!, I’m stuck on this one.
You must have missed the point about the pristine printed absentee ballots fed through the tabulators. There at least 9 witnesses to this happening in GA.
You don’t think that they couldn’t have come up with fraudulent votes to match the numbers they were manipulating? It’s not like any GOP observers could actually see much anything in the recounts or audit the actual ballots.
I can recount 100 of counterfeit bills and still come up with 100.
Because, as Sydney Powell has stated, they’re also just making up votes taken out of the ether.
THAT’S why her lawsuits are so powerful.
Why is that so hard to believe? As evidence, look at the Russia fiasco, how much of that was simply made up?
100% of it, and the list of such things is endless, Corona? Mask efficiency? Lockdown effectiveness? Global Warming? Acid Rain? Cranberry Panic? Jumping the Border an act of Love? Releasing prisoners to protect them from Corona?
So, why WOULDN’T they also ‘invent’ votes?
You keep assuming that there would be a manual recount.
The architects for this sort of fraud would be doing their best to insure that no recount ever happens. And if a recount did happen, they would plan to exclude observers. Of course, things do not always go according to plans.
The reported miracle machine from Wayne County GA is supposed to always tally a 26.5% "win" for Joe Biden, no matter what ballot counts are run through it. Repeated tests show the same result.
If this report is accurate, then there is your answer than makes any sense.
They just went and did it. One of the machines was captured before they could erase the gimmick. It shows reproducible results. QED.
And if they did it once, you can bet they did it more than once.
In addition to the after-midnight traditional ballot-box stuffing (that was captured on video) when the gimmicked tally machines were insufficient to get the desired results.
After all, you always gotta have a backup plan.
It’s a ridiculously stupid and ineffective way to rig any election that uses paper ballots — for this very reason.
The Trump campaign hasn't demanded recounts in most of these states. There is a reason for this: It’s because they know this is a BALLOT issue, not a COMPUTER issue.
The 5 million hand recount in Georgia is a lie. In many wards, the precinct captains ordered the workers to report the same original count reported on election day. GOP reps were not allowed to observe all the counting. In other areas, they only counted a subset sample, not the entire collection of ballots. I believe Sidney Powell. The hand recount was a farce.
Correct.
* 1.8 billion communist Chinese
* 1.6 billion India
That’s billion. They want control of our land.
Correct.
* 1.8 billion communist Chinese
* 1.6 billion India
That’s billion. They want control of our land.
Bottom Line: NONE of these judges have the balls to allow it because NONE of these judges want to be “arkancided”.
NO ONE messes with the PIAPS...or the Toons, in general.
It’s the PIAPS revenge. /s
David Blackmon - three words: “Fight for Trump!!”
Your articles used to be so good - now you seem to be hedging your bets - so that if the Democrats succeed in stealing this election - you can have bragging rights that your gloomy predictions were right..
They know that both pathways of fraud were used.
The ballot fraud is easier to prove because there are many more accessible witnesses.
“You expected the swamp to rule against itself?”
BULLSEYE!!!
I watched Sidney Powell on Newsmax’s Greg Kelly show. She gave a quick update. The team is “doing fine.” The setback involved U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten calling Powell’s bid to decertify Georgia’s election “the most extraordinary relief ever sought” for an election in a court. On Kelly’s show, Powell said Batten gave his ruling in a pre-written opinion that did not consider the evidence of her case. She will call for emergency relief in a higher court (SCOTUS?).
“Batten gave his ruling in a pre-written opinion that did not consider the evidence of her case”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.