Non-sequitur argument. Lin is a subversive. If you are unable or unwilling to see that on your own, then there is nothing I can state that will prove such to you. The man is instructing the gullible and those who are caught up in emotion rather than reason to give control of the country to the communists.
RE: Non-sequitur argument. Lin is a subversive.
Why does it not follow?
Trump saw the light, why, based on Lin Wood’s actions today does it not similarly apply to him?
If you wish to argue that the evidence he presents are based on flimsy material, I am willing to listen. But to call him a snake in the grass requires more knowledge than you are privy to.