Uh, did you read the complaint, "Your Honor"? That's still in debate. They alledge that the reported number of people in fact DID NOT vote for Biden, in fact that Biden votes are less than Trump's. So if they're right, then denying them the opportunity to prove it IS substituting your judgement for that of the voters. Dumbshit, er, Your Honor.
Related: What do you call an attorney that graduates in the bottom 5% of his class? "Your Honor"
Well - with vehicles and homes now being bombed... I’m not surprised a governor (Georgia’s Kemp) or these judges would play dumb...
There is something mathematically wrong when judges claim that decertifying would be “disenfranchising the 2.5M voters who voted for Biden...”
If there was ANY voter fraud that tipped the scales for Biden, the judge is DISENFRANCHISING the several million voters who voted FOR Trump if he ignores the fraud!!
For example, suppose:
1. There were 2,500,000 “votes” for Biden
2. There were 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
3. Biden is declared the winner by the DemMedia
4. Later, it was proven that TWO (2) “dead” people voted for Biden, so they are properly tossed out.
Now, with a corrected election tally, Trump wins:
1. 2,499,999 votes for Trump.
2. 2,499,998 votes for Biden.
The point is that even if only a FEW fraudulent votes are found, those few votes have the effect of disenfranchising MILLIONS of legal voters.
The judge is looking at this backwards: He is incorrectly discriminating on behalf of the 2.5 million votes by choosing to not rectify the fraudulent votes within.