ONLY a sample was hand counted. So only mirrored the initial counting, not exposing anything. It was raffie’s scam.
Can we PLEASE get our facts right? The facts are that only a sample was REQUIRED to be hand counted, but Raffensperger ordered that the sample was to be 100% of the ballots, thus ALL paper ballots were hand counted. Every one of them. That was Raffensperger's decision after Garland Favorito urged him to do a 100% hand count. Of course no one is ever satisfied in this, but Raffensperger did us a great favor in having all the paper ballots hand counted. If there had been massive electronic fraud, the election would already have been overturned. But instead, we have people like you who have convinced themselves that we didn't do a 100% hand count in Georgia and use the "risk limited audit" specifications to suggest that. Again, Raffensperger ordered a 100% hand recount instead of a statistical sample.