Replies

this is not clear. Lets be careful

UBS Securities is a Swiss Investment Bank with HQ in New York.

UBS Securities Co Ltd is a Chinese-Based Investment Bank, 25% owned by UBS, for offering investments and investment services IN CHINA. FYI - many American investment banks also have similar China joint ventures.

If the money came from UBS Securities it would be no different than a payment done by Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, etc…

Lin should be clear, so he doesn’t confuse people - then he will have no credibility.

Good advice and we should be careful with this. I will say that the “ownership” of Dominion and investors appears to be extraordinarily murky. In fact, it appears intentional. Does it mean the ownership is nefarious? Not directly, but it does make it appear more likely.

There are also a lot of people saying that part of Dominion is owned by Soros entities and there are connections between the bigwigs and the Soros umbrella.

At the very least, this does appear to be something that our government should have been on top of doesn’t it? Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren thought so at one time. Ironic.

RE: If the money came from UBS Securities it would be no different than a payment done by Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, etc…

From the article, it says, the firm which owns Dominion Voting Systems received $400 million dollars from a Swiss bank with close links to the Chinese government less than a month before the election.

Does Goldman, JP Morgan or any other American Investment bank have any interest in owning Dominion Software?

Let me follow up my question with another one t understand your point... all you’re saying is this:

All this document is saying is that UBS was compensated for selling shares in Staple Street Capital. It doesn’t say that UBS bought those shares.

In other words, you could have substituted UBS with Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan and it will then look benign since all they’re doing is act as BROKERS for the sale.

In other words — there is still some ways to go to prove that China has a CONTROLLING interest in Dominion.

Am I right in my understanding of what you’re trying to say?

This may shed some light on Chinas’
investments in the US.

“The latest securitization foray by Bank of China involved teaming up with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank on a $900 million loan on a 1.7 million-square-foot office and retail property in Manhattan’s Times Square.”

From this link;
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323478304578332161219376092

This is just one transaction and
shows just how deep Chinas’
tentacles reach in the US.

Those that have followed Wall St predatory lending since the repeal of Glass Steagall know that big banks set up hedge funds in NYC for equity and bond markets. For example, Bank of America has Bank of America Securities which was literally run by crooks, a literal crime syndicate.

These hedge funds take in investment funds or leveraged margin funds from fiat creation and they buy and sell securities publicly and privately. In this case UBS Securities in NYC funded UBS Securities CO LTD by a trade of fiat paper for equity paper, fiat for ownership.

Now why would they do that? The answer is found in knowing why the CCP was interested in UBS in Zurich.

What UBS had in Zurich that the CCP wanted was gold.

UBS Zurich has a high rise building but there are 11 stories underground that contain gold safekeeping areas. The amount of gold is vast and the security is very elaborate.

The CCP wants to replace the US Dollar with their Renminbi and they thought to do that by backing their Renminbi with gold.

The CCP tried to buy out UBS Zurich over many years but that was not possible apparently or is still an ongoing effort. But UBS Securities Co Ltd was the vehicle that was trying to do that. It needed to look like UBS and it had been funded in part by UBS ostensibly because the CCP had bought a lot of UBS shares. It is an ‘investment’ structure for both CCP and UBS to play the bond and equity markets. Dominion was an equity target that aligned with the CCP plan to control elections. But there were many others which can be described as Dominion cousins because they all get their software from the same source.

To make it clear one has to understand that the world is small at the top, everybody that is somebody knows each other.

There are info nuggets that can blow minds how connected the world is at the top whatever ‘top’ means.

For example, there are reports that Bear Stearns managers after they had collapsed the mortgage markets were hired into the Federal Reserve (unbelievable) while others went to work for Dominion Voting Systems and cousins thereof. If true, we have a cast of bad actors that migrated from causing the financial collapse into an activity slated to steal elections. The intersection is technology, government relations, investment banks and rogue intel groups acting as enforcers for central bankers.