Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

This is the student newspaper’s analysis that was pulled down and not the actual John’s Hopkins report. The actual John’s Hopkins study remains as issued.

The JHN article was pulled down on Thursday without explanation. The student newspaper on Friday wrote on Twitter that the article was “being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies” about the impact of the pandemic, and that they “regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.”

Briand’s webinar, in which she explained her findings in detail with graphs, is still available on Johns Hopkins University’s YouTube channel.
Briand stands by her analysis. You should have figured out that the vast majority of the article you posted is not in “quotes” of Briand and was rather the analysis of some JH student with an agenda.


6 posted on 11/27/2020 9:09:55 PM PST by Chumdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chumdad
The student newspaper on Friday wrote on Twitter that the article was "being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies" about [...]

In the 15th century, that was known as "heresy."

Regards,

12 posted on 11/27/2020 9:43:29 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson