Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Now Says Biden Will Have To 'Prove' His 80 Million Votes Weren't Fraudulent Before Giving Up White House
USSA News ^ | 11/27/2020 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 11/27/2020 8:27:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
To: SeekAndFind
"Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous “80,000,000 votes” were not fraudulently or illegally obtained," tweeted Trump,

Actually as plaintiff it's Trump's responsibility for proving the 80 million votes are fraudulent.

21 posted on 11/27/2020 8:40:57 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Traveler's Advisory just issued for the US, Canada, and all EU countries:

Until further notice, all persons should wear boots and helmets, as the streets will be running with liberal diarrhea. The sky will be falling. Updates as they become available.

Do I need to label this as sarcasm?

22 posted on 11/27/2020 8:41:08 AM PST by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
If I’m not mistaken, there are 130,000 votes in either Michigan or Wisconsin, that showed up out of nowhere and there seems to be a question if there are actual ballots associated with them. Yes/No?

There are so many stories about fraudulent votes going around that it' hard to keep them straight. Let's just day it wouldn't surprise me if it's true.

23 posted on 11/27/2020 8:42:32 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m just guessing but I’m betting the MSM, that appears to be ignoring the Sydney Powell Georgia and Michigan Briefs in Federal Court story, will be all over these Trump remarks like a wet towel.

Personally I doubt seriously if Biden will make any attempt whatsoever to validate his 80,000,000 votes. Of course he couldn’t do if he tried so why bother. Biden knows what went down. He probably has a more accurate legal vote estimate than any of us. So he knows Trump received more legal votes than he did.


24 posted on 11/27/2020 8:43:45 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The numbers (from one of my previous posts):

Check out the popular vote for the Democratic candidate for President, 2008, 2012, 2016 and then 2020:

2008: 69.5M–the first black candidate–massive enthusiasm in the black community

2012: 65.9M–the thrill is gone, turnout goes down

2016: 65.8M–black turnout stays low with no black candidate

2020: 79.8M–This incredibly high turnout was because the Democrats offered a young, articulate, visionary candidate who had huge campaign rallies around the country motivating Democrats to vote

(Is there _anyone_ on the planet stupid enough to _believe_ _that_ 2020 narrative? Anyone?)


25 posted on 11/27/2020 8:43:59 AM PST by cgbg ( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This appears to be a time-tested Democrat vote fraud trick:
<><> residents submitted a National Change of Address form to the USPS, indicating they had moved out of state,
<><> yet they voted in 2020 in the state they no longer resided in.

===============================================

Data analyst Matt Braynard, data and strategy director for Pres Trump’s 2016 election campaign, found such people:
<><> 138,221 in Georgia, a much larger number than the state’s current vote differential (12,670) in the presidential race.
<><> Michigan had 51,302 such people;
<><> Wisconsin had 26,673,
<><> Nevada had 27,271, Arizona had 19,997,
<><> Pennsylvania had 13,671.

“The number of questionable ballots surpasses the vote margin in at least three states w/ a combined total of 37 electoral votes—--Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin,” Braynard told The Epoch Times on Nov. 25.

Braynard said, “This isn’t speculative. This is what the data shows, the numbers are high enough to 'easily' overturn current election projections."

26 posted on 11/27/2020 8:43:59 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Now Biden must rebut it.

Biden has. He's said there was no fraud. Now what?

27 posted on 11/27/2020 8:44:00 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Biden demonrats DO NEED TO PROVE their numbers and they WON’T be able to do it.
If the proof of the numbers isn’t there, the demonrats are dead in the election waters.


28 posted on 11/27/2020 8:44:10 AM PST by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

If we can prove that there were corrupted Biden votes, that would be illegal votes, then the candidate (Biden) must be disqualified. He cannot serve as president if he received illegal votes.


29 posted on 11/27/2020 8:44:53 AM PST by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And with that comment, President Trump made liberals go crazy !


30 posted on 11/27/2020 8:44:54 AM PST by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Electoral college will vote.

That will be it.

The media does t want to believe that. Lots of people on FR don’t want to believe that.

But, that will be it.


31 posted on 11/27/2020 8:45:22 AM PST by Vermont Lt (We have entered "Insanity Week." Act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Since this is the case, there IS a compelling argument for NOT certifying election results when there are credible allegations of fraud: Following the constitutionally-prescribed process when neither candidate has a majority of electoral votes.

Get a court to order it. Let me know when they do.

32 posted on 11/27/2020 8:46:14 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doc maverick

That’s his point. Show it’s not fraudulent or he’s not leaving.


33 posted on 11/27/2020 8:48:50 AM PST by LibertyWoman (It's NOT over until President Donald J Trump says it is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is media jiu jitsu. Brilliant.


34 posted on 11/27/2020 8:49:00 AM PST by Fido969 (,i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

im probably going to get burned for saying this, but in my opinion burden of proof rests on trumps shoulders. It isnt up to biden to prove the votes that put him over the top wasnt fraudulent. It us up to trump to prove they were.


35 posted on 11/27/2020 8:49:45 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“But, that will be it.”

You may want to check past elections.


36 posted on 11/27/2020 8:50:36 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

But since this is a civil case only a preponderance of the evidence has to be presented.
In this particular case there is no beyond a reasonable doubt needed.

It’s interesting that the threshold for contesting in overthrowing this election only requires the establishment the preponderance of evidence that there was cheating voter manipulation and election corruption Of the entire process.

The election WILL be overturned at some level.. up to and including the house election of 1 vote per state delegation.


37 posted on 11/27/2020 8:51:19 AM PST by MIA_eccl1212 (When the bad guys have leverage they use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
I’m just guessing but I’m betting the MSM, that appears to be ignoring the Sydney Powell Georgia and Michigan Briefs in Federal Court story, will be all over these Trump remarks like a wet towel.

Doesn't matter, the media doesn't decide. Courts then legislatures.

38 posted on 11/27/2020 8:51:52 AM PST by Fido969 (,i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

That is the way the law works—we have to prove the bank robber robbed the bank.

However, when there is no rule of law, we can do whatever we want to the bank robber.

When elections are stolen by massive fraud, then there is no rule of law.


39 posted on 11/27/2020 8:52:02 AM PST by cgbg ( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

Yes....they’ve become the PRAVDA of the 21 century! The media fiction has become so obvious and they continue to their own doom just like PRAVDA.

PRAVDA was once the voice of the Russian people.....then it corrupted itself by becoming part of the elitist establishment.

Folks, you are watching a slow motion instant replay of the downfall of PRAVDA.


40 posted on 11/27/2020 8:52:24 AM PST by blackberry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson