If this was an error it seems to been an intentional one. Is this enough proof for the doubters who say there was no proof? It would have been plenty in other circumstances. There are those saying that so-called “climate change deniers” should be jailed when there is never any proof of climate change except what is natural. What about those denying this proof of voting/election irregularities? Sure can’t say it is natural.
Good podt; worthy of a double!