[headstamp 2]

Baier was just dissembling about their narrative on “No widespread fraud” could be found but he didn’t mean no fraud was found.

[MayflowerMadam]

“he didn’t mean no fraud was found.”

Does he know that when even one fraudulent ballot is cast, it negates a legal vote for the other side? Does he care?

[dforest]

How does Baier know that no widespread fraud could be found?

Did he ever look? If you refuse to look and accept the narrative of the supposed “news” department that employs no investigative journalists who care about the legal votes of all citizens, then of course, nothing to see here.

FOX is a joke.

[steve in DC]

That statement is true.

There is no “widespread” fraud.

It is narrowly concentrated in certain Democrat run cities. But where 100,000 votes can be switched or manufactured in these several narrowly concentrated areas, there is really no need for the fraud to be “widespread”.

[Shortstop7]

Baier is an arrogant, pompous ass. I've always like Hemmer but yesterday I read somewhere that when a guest mentioned voter fraud, Hemmer said something like "time for Trump to put up or shut up" about the cheating.

That absolutely infuriated me. Isn't it the media's job to search out, investigate and REPORT the fraud?