Replies

In the end there have to be physical ballots that get sealed in boxes that have to match the vote numbers that are touted in the virtual realm. The physical ballots have to match the precinct logs as to who voted in person and by absentee and who didn’t amongst those who are actually registered to vote in any given precinct. For instance the precinct logs may say there are 3000 voters in that one precinct but for that election the logs will tell you only 2400 voted either in person or by absentee or mail in. If you only find 2000 ballots that means the vote count is suspect...where are the missing ballots.

If the ballot count is 3500 and after checking for late registrations the official registrars voter population count is 3150 for the precinct then two questions arise. You have 350 ballots more than there are voters in the precinct;you have to eliminate the excess but how do you eliminate the fake vote numbers discerning who really voted for whom. You can examine the absentees/mail ins to seeif their name match up and if they showed up to in person vote as well. But I fear you won’t catch everything wrong in that vote stash

The second question becomes even more interesting...even having eliminated the excess votes you still have a situation where 100 percent of the precinct has voted(3150 out of 3150). The only way to check that is to check the visitor/voter logs vs the ballots received. Everyone who votes gets checked in either in person or who is recorded as having received a mail ballot by request and has sent that back in.If the logs don’t match the 100 percent then you have a vote anomaly.

Thus I think the only cure for the above is to have the votes in the above fictitious precinct disallowed. There are rarely 100 percents but when there are any vote counts above 100 percent of the recorded voter population the vote ballots in that precinct are spoiled and the precinct’s vote must be considered fraudulent.