How to prove such a ballot is invalid? Suspicion is not evidence
Statics are a valid proof of fraud. When you keep books in a way that are a statistical impossibility it’s fraud.
We are talking about election law and politics, not a criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. Another good data point would be to find out how many people voted for Trump only. I’m betting that it’s almost ZERO.
Uh...forensics showing the same ink and pen for 1000 ballots? Just for starters..
I've heard there is something called spectiscopy (sp?) that can test ink. If hundreds of them are from the same ink pen, it's likely fraud. I think we have to either get fraudulent ballots thrown out in court, or have certain swing state's results declared invalid and have them (just them) vote over again. This time in person, with both DNC and GOP poll watchers on sight, and ballots counted by hand.
LOL!! You must be from DU if you say that plus you don’t know who Sydney Powell is!!
TROLL ALERT?
“Suspicion is not evidence”
450,000 ballots with only Biden being voted for is not suspicion, it is evidence.
“How to prove such a ballot is invalid? Suspicion is not evidence”
It’s called “circumstantial” EVIDENCE. It is how most cases are decided. The more you have, the better.
“Preponderance of the evidence is one type of evidentiary standard used in a burden of proof analysis. Under the preponderance standard, the burden of proof is met when the party with the burden convinces the fact finder that there is a greater than 50% chance that the claim is true.”
Not to mention physical ballots, tally sheets, eye witnesses, photos and videos, etc.
There will be TONS of evidence.
A case this HUGH, will certainly be decided by the Trump Supreme Court. (fact finder).
Winning the lotto is not suspicious. Winning it three times is.
This is kinda like that.
This is beyond suspicion. You don't magically come up with 450,000 votes all for 1 person. The odds of that happening are in the trillions, especially since the down ballot gave Trump a red wave. But here's how to do it
1.trace the ballot to the person
2 verify the post office where the cancellation stamp came from, and verify the volume from the post office
3. Verify the voter registration to the voter and database the address to the person
4. Verify death records
And 5 which is the most intriguing if true, if the mailin ballots were indeed watermarked with QFS Blockchain Encryption Code, fake ballots wont have it. If they are copied and pick up the code, the code will be generated as the same 450,000 times.
I honestly believe that Trump is setting the entire DNC for the largest Rope-A-Dope in history. He is way way too quiet, and yesterday was playing golf. There is no way in hell someone who doesn't have a plan would be that calm. He is just waiting for all the states to stop counting and then go in for the kill! Remember that the DNC were begging for Trump to do something to protect elections from foreign interference.....only they didn't think that they were the ones Trump was setting up.
Still early in the game. Do not loose faith.
“How to prove such a ballot is invalid? Suspicion is not evidence”
However, the sheer numbers of people doing so speaks directly to fraud. Yesterday I read (don’t remember where, sorry) that the numbers are about 6 times higher than would normally be expected. This is a statistical impossibility - it has probably a 1 in 10 million chance of being accurate without fraud.
Now consider that the turnout for Trump on ED was so high that it exceeded all expectations - and that overwhelmed the OTHER fraud that the Dems committed with the machines (using a system called Scorecard) to give Biden a victory. That explains why in ALL of the states at issue the polls were suddenly (and almost simultaneously) shut down on Election night until the next morning: because they had to manufacture the votes. The rush job that they had to do required them to have their (corrupt) campaign workers just mark the ballots for Biden - because if he didn’t win, their frauds would be discovered and lots of people would go to jail.
This isn’t a murder trial, where you have to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that something took place - there just has to be a reasonable suspicion, and ballots can be tossed in large numbers (or a state legislature can simply decide to award the state to the non-cheating side because the vote totals were irreversibly contaminated and SOMEONE has to win.
“How to prove such a ballot is invalid? Suspicion is not evidence.”
Trump lawyers don’t need to prove any ballots are invalid.
Each state’s Secretary of State must certify election results are accurate and correct.
If challenged - they have to he able to prove it.
They can recount.
They can re-canvas.
They can audit systems, procedures and supporting documents.
If discrepancies or exceptions are found - there are all sorts of further tests and remedies to ascertain whether it was due to human error, fraud, or machine malfunction - and whether it is a widespread or isolated.
If underlying documents are missing or destroyed or legal procedure were not followed, such that the results can’t be verified - that is THEIR problem.