Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Thank God for forums such as this one.
1 posted on 10/15/2020 8:02:14 AM PDT by rustyweiss74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rustyweiss74

If Biden wins, you can count on the Dems finding a way to strangle all the conservative forums. They are hell-bent on one-party communist rule and will brook no opposition.


2 posted on 10/15/2020 8:04:33 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

If there is a conspiracy between them I would use the antitrust laws.


3 posted on 10/15/2020 8:04:51 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

Plenty of us imagined it. When they came after Alex Jones that was a HUGE red herring. People hated Alex so much that they didn’t care and didn’t want to stand up for him. This was entirely predictable


4 posted on 10/15/2020 8:05:26 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

Why is information so dangerous to these people.

If these were real falsehoods, you would debunk them and move on.

Censorship is not about debunking lies because it’s innane when it does that. It’s about silencing damaging truths.


5 posted on 10/15/2020 8:06:35 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

Twitter and Facebook don’t pretend to be journalists. They are biased forums that unfortunately have huge usage, viewership and influence. However it is now clearly crunch time for the New York Times. The Times has access to the same hard drive that is the source of the NY Post stories. Will the Times exercise what is left of their claim to being journalists, duly study the harddrive, investigate and publish a story? Or will having so much vested in the Leftist narrative ignore it and openly collude with the Biden campaign. Clearly if the Times writes a story the wall of resistance in the rest of the MSM will collapse and the Biden candidacy will be ruined. However the leftist owners, editors and hard core staff of the Times will probably easily resist the urge to print the news and the last vestiges of intergity will be gone at the once notable New York Times.


8 posted on 10/15/2020 8:17:39 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

Bookmark Today’s Date – Big Tech Has Crossed The Event Horizon to Protect Joe Biden…

Posted on  by 

Everyone knew it would eventually happen and today is the day.  In an effort to influence the 2020 U.S. election, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter and the social media technocrats have crossed the Rubicon today and banned all sharing of the explosive information about Hunter and Joe Biden’s self-serving deals with Ukraine.

In an effort to stop evidence from surfacing showing candidate Joe Biden lied about his involvement with corrupt Ukraine business deals, Facebook and Twitter have openly deployed their activist technicians to generate algorithms blocking content sharing of The New York Post article(s).  Additionally all users, including White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany are being removed from all platforms for sharing the story.

The New York Post responds:

So much for Facebook’s claims to be a neutral platform: One of its top execs just put the social media giant firmly in the pro-Biden camp. And Twitter soon followed suit.

Andy Stone, Facebook’s policy communications manager, boasted about burying The Post’s story on proof that Hunter Biden merchandized access to his dad.

Stone’s tweet Wednesday morning: “While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact-checked by Facebook’s third-party fact-checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform.”

Within hours, Twitter was preventing users from tweeting out the story — with a high-tech trick that let you seem to post it, only to send your tweet into some holding-tank limbo. Its excuse was the supposed “lack of authoritative reporting on the origins of the materials included in the article,” which might — might! — violate its “Hacked Materials Policy.” That The Post made it very clear how the information ended up in the newspaper’s possession didn’t matter. (read more)

This is the moment when the event horizon is crossed.  This is the moment when Big Tech goes all-in to influence the election.  This is the moment of no retreat for those who own and operate the social media platforms.  If they lose the 2020 election, the social media platforms will be regulated and dismantled…. they know it… and they are all-in.

These entities are worth hundreds of billions, and all of those stakeholders are now exposed to the outcome of the 2020 election.  The scale of the financial risk shows how severe this move is… yes, they are all-in.  It should also be remembered that former FBI chief-legal-counsel James Baker is now the lead counsel for Facebook.

Remarkably, and reflecting the strength and accuracy of the documentary evidence, according to Politico the Biden campaign is now making a strategic retreat from their previous denials:

[…]  In a statement, Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said, “we have reviewed Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time and no meeting, as alleged by the New York Post, ever took place.”

[…] Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction with Pozharskyi, which wouldn’t appear on Biden’s official schedule. But they said any encounter would have been cursory. Pozharskyi did not respond to a request for comment. (read more)

Yet, despite the shift in the Biden campaign statement; which now reflects the accuracy of the New York Post reporting; the tech overlords are still trying to protect their candidate.


[Several imbedded tweets follow at linked story]

 

9 posted on 10/15/2020 8:23:37 AM PDT by Bratch (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


14 posted on 10/15/2020 9:01:47 AM PDT by bitt (He is fighting for us so I am going to fight for him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

It’s not censorship. It is suppression.


15 posted on 10/15/2020 9:02:00 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

Tucker’s got amazing instincts... he’s right, it’s either censorship... or an ‘in-kind’ contribution to a campaign...

Or maybe both... or more.

Thanks Tucker...


17 posted on 10/15/2020 11:13:07 AM PDT by GOPJ (Biden's base: Why doesn't Biden's Tour have rallies in black communities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rustyweiss74

My local radio affiliate is ignoring the story while at the same time Rush is blasting the story on his show. This is surreal.


18 posted on 10/15/2020 11:14:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson