That has nothing to do with jurisdiction.
Yes, a foreign nation would be more inclined to advocate for one of their citizens but, a) they aren't obligated to, and b) countries make pleas all the time asking other countries to treat people well regardless of citizenship.
I asked for a right or obligation associated with political jurisdiction and you haven't provided one.
When you apply for certain government jobs - or getting a security clearance from an agency of the United States - you will rapidly find out that you have disabilities since your allegiance is questionable.
BS.
If the only question about allegiance is based on having parents from allied countries who hadn't naturalized yet it wouldn't get a second look. Our intelligence services aren't that stupid.
And as far as my analysis goes, it’s not a “post hoc” conclusion, it’s based on the Amicus Curiae submitted by John Eastman and Edwin Meese in the case of Hamdi...
OK. You have a couple of bitter enders arguing that Wong Kim Ark was wrongly decided in 1898.
Compelling.
I have the entire judicial history since the 14th, including the popular and Congressional election of Obama.
I win.
You know, as an Attorney, you’d lose every time. As it’s said in the courts...the law is technical.
You ran through the same crap on the last few threads like this and its the same nonsense: people give you concrete answers, you dismiss them with flimsy hand waving.
Each example given was a real one that I personally was familiar with. As far as ‘our intelligence services aren’t that stupid’, well, they would beg to differ. Something as trivial as a person’s mother being born in Windsor, Ontario and not 200 yards across the bridge was enough for them. There’s a reason for that. You go figure it out.
And no, you didn’t win, you got lost again in the maze of your own flighty arguments.
Not only is Kamala Harris not a “natural born citizen”, she isn’t even a citizen at all in the eyes of not just a couple of “bitter enders” - a pre-eminent law professor at one of the best schools in America, and the former Attorney General of the United States under Ronald Reagan - but a significant fraction of the citizenry.
Nope. I win. On the evidence and the law.