“Warning: The video below contains graphic images and language.”
I can’t believe even a so called conservatives site feels the need to put in these insipid, infantalizing warnings like they’re talking to a 4 year old child.
And on top of that there is no violence to be seen in the video!
It’s absurd...to label this graphic, or that the AntiFa Garrett guy is a ‘victim’.
Here’s a much better thread on this Austin shooting, with facts, pic/vid links...that DON’T require clicking on to this poster’s blog....
.
At least 1 shot during downtown Austin protest, medics searching for other victims, officials say....
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3868515/posts
Well some of us have long been sick of the creeping foulness in this forum.
So yeah, some of us don’t like it, and we know that children could be seeing it.
I don’t like foul language (though shamefully I use it...when angry, not as common speech); it is hostile talk. Fighin’ words. That’s why it is bad. It creates a hostile environment.
This is the first time on TV children are subjected not just to violence, but foul language everywhere including on signs, etc, from these scum. We don’t need more.
***infantalizing warnings like they’re talking to a 4 year old child.***
We oldsters still remember the 1940s and 1950s when walking the gauntlet of TRUE CRIME, blood and guts magazines, Inquirer tabloids loaded with photos of train, hitchhiker, mob, robbery victims every time we went to the checkout stand at the grocery store.
We were well acquainted with death by the time we were ten years old.