Posted on 03/28/2020 8:55:30 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
0-29 years 1 30-39 years 18 40-49 years 76 50-59 years 314 60-69 years 971 70-79 years 2,967 80-89 years 3,344 90 years and older 767
(Excerpt) Read more at statista.com ...
Not given in this data source, but i read on a reddit sub that, underlying this, a vast majority of deaths were people with critical conditions.
As if mostly, the dead are people who were already likely to die at their next infection.
Suggestion is most of these would be dead if the got the flu, or a severe cold, or any othe number of illness.
0-29 years 1
30-39 years 18
40-49 years 76
50-59 years 314
60-69 years 971
70-79 years 2,967
80-89 years 3,344
90 years and older 767
Those #s need to be normalized to be per capita.
Funny how closely they are tied to normal mortality tables.
Hey, ...if I was a conspiracy nut, I swear that there might be some risk that a person might be wrongly classified into the Covid column from something else...
Has a release of national death rates been revealed for last year, this year, to see if the total number of deaths this year to last are any different....AT ALL?
Gender, ethnic background, blood type ?
Just curious
“Those #s need to be normalized to be per capita.”
Google has a calculator!
Java has all sorts of functions and apps built upon it.
Git ‘er done.
Peeps need to be smarter when attempting to communicate efficiently.
Not my job mon...
LSM needs to step up.
Pandemic statistics in the politically correct era. Why are not the race, underlying medical conditions, habits, medications taken being released? No doubt elderly people are very susceptible to develop serious disease or die from this novel coronavirus. But just who are the people under 60 that are becoming seriously ill and dying from this virus. As usual the devil is in the details. Definitely would not fit the political narrative if the young people who become seriously ill of die turn out to be Asian, AIDS patients, marijuana smokers, drug users, alcoholics etc. The CDC and WHO are being very circumspect on how known data is tabulated and released.
In your defense I will say that a link to some data is welcome.
Of course it is from 2018, but still interesting.
Italy does have a large cohort of oldsters.
That probably says there is a lotta good in the local environments.
This article deals with all the questions I have about reporting of this virus and speaks to the one you brought up. Overall the supposed information seems too speculative and too easily adapted to political motives.
How deadly is the coronavirus? Its still far from clear
https://spectator.us/deadly-coronavirus-still-far-clear-covid-19/
For a single-payer medical system, the virus epidemic may be just the thing to lighten the medical load on the system by eliminating those who have the most demand. This is one element of single-payer that I am most against.
Yep, it’s what they don’t tell you that is important.
Interesting that it doesn’t kill as many people who are over 90, as the slightly younger ones.
Such racial statistics would alert those in certain racial communities to become more careful. Why would a government hide that information from those most vulnerable unless they want that sector to be killed off?
Highlights
In the winter seasons from 2013/14 to 2016/17, an estimated average of 5,290,000 ILI cases occurred in Italy, corresponding to an incidence of 9%.
More than 68,000 deaths attributable to flu epidemics were estimated in the study period.
Italy showed a higher influenza attributable excess mortality compared to other European countries. especially in the elderly.
Probably because there aren’t as many people over 90. They are already dead.
“Peeps need to be smarter when attempting to communicate efficiently.”
Ping me when you finish.
Not my job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.