Neil Cavuto has never liked Trump.
I think Neil’s health issues are catching up on him.
My wife through the same thing before passed.
you could post 100 articles like this on fox lately.
long past due to switch to one america news, fox is done
He’s right, he doesn’t work for Donald Trump. He works for Paul Ryan.
“Stoddard mentioned Trump’s poor showings in the 2016 debates.”
I watched all the debates, and I totally missed “Trump’s poor showings.”
In fact I didn’t see ONE “poor showing”.
Commenting on Traitor/Turncoat/Evil/Backstabbing Snake/ useless, Neil Cavuto is a waste of time, Mr. Cavuto is just simply a worthless piece of envious and hateful form of humanity...sadly. But...the truth is the truth...Amen!!!
FNC has a few beauties Neil Cavuto & Chris Wallace to name two of them, who should objectively be fired immediately for their hateful bias and unfairness!!! Case Closed!!!
Cavuto is the weakest link at Fox News, now that Shep Smith is gone.
Good article.
Cavuto=douchebag!
What a GREAT article!
He covered everything I was thinking except one:
Cavuto and his “both sides do it.”
I emailed him once asking WHAT have republicans done to the dimocrats that EQUATES to what they do to us???
I still think A.B. Stoddard is Bill Kristol in drag. Has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?
A.B. and Cavuto should are gold metalists in the smug olympics. Cavuto ends most sentences with, right?
Trump always fights back. Bloomberg was defenseless ( clueless).
Excellent piece
The only FoxNews programs I watch at all......The Five and Tucker. And if the Five has Brazile or anybody else who constantly just spouts Leftist talking points, I turn off the Five, too.
We Decide What to Report so That You Can Decide. No retorts allowed to PROPAGANDA lite. (Haven’t watched in 8 years. Chuck Kraut’s analysis of one of the Romney /PUKE Obama debates did it for me)
I do not watch Neil. He is a lefty IMHO.
I saw it and was pissed as hell!! They think we are EFFIN STUPID!!! Sorry you ass “THIS DOG AIN’T GONNA HUNT”!!!!
Neil Cavuto is the round mound of unsound and unfounded analysis.
It seems to me, that what Stoddard & Cavuto were referring to were polls immediately taken after the Trump debates. Whether anyone likes it or not, the polls were not favorable to Trump, but he nevertheless won the election. Then Stoddard compared those polls to Bloomberg’s performance. Maybe her point was that just because someone does poorly in debates, doesn’t stop them from winning the election.