Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

I listened to part of yesterday’s farce with Taylor. The only thing that was clearly established, was that there was no “quid pro quo” whatsoever, of any kind. Quid was completely, 100% destroyed by Taylor’s answers to Jordan’s questions. To say otherwise, is a lie and propaganda.

In a real court, not a star chamber, neither Kent nor Taylor would be called as witnesses, since they have zero credible information - only their own worthless opinions. Then, if they had testified, the case would be dismissed immediately by the judge after Jordan’s questions and Taylor’s answers and the prosecutor admonished for bringing the case with zero evidence.


15 posted on 11/14/2019 7:02:24 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rigelkentaurus

The problem is that this is not a real court,m their is no judge controlling the hearing. Congress can see and hear what they want to see and hear.


47 posted on 11/14/2019 7:19:35 AM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson