I would think they’d have to prove that Lanza saw the advertising. Otherwise, why would it matter?
Good point, but Adam Lanza didn’t buy the firearms he used. His mother did. Lanza killed her and stole her firearms.
The only strategy the plaintiff has is prejudice nd pity for the parents. This will come down to jury selection. All woman, all Democrat jury coming up.
Actually, they have to prove that Lanza saw the ad and chose to steal his mother’s Remington as a result.
Lanza did not buy the firearm...he stole it as an easy opportunity.