(A) A Vice President strong-arming a foreign government threatening to withhold foreign aid to protect his son?
(B) Or a President asking a foreign government to investigate obviously improper actions by a sitting VP?
"I'll take (A) for $500, Alex."
<><> Biden’s son Hunter once worked with a Romanian businessman who was convicted and imprisoned following an investigation over his real estate dealings.
<><> The NYT reported Hunter increased his intl business efforts during his father’s second term as vice president.
<><> In the VP's second term, his son Hunter began associating with intl figures about whom the US or its ally nations were suspicious.
<><> Hunter Biden reportedly began advising Gabriel Popoviciu, a Romanian businessman (said to have opened the
country's first Pizza Hut), who was under scrutiny over his real estate dealings.
<><> Other reports WRT Hunter's $50,000 per month job in the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings indicate
Obama was fully aware of the situation and crafted US foreign policy around it.
<><>Burisma appointed Hunter as a board member AT THE SAME TIME
the Obama administration was mulling a course of action amid Russia's invasion in Eastern Ukraine.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Since the President is the Chief Law Enforcement Office, were is the problem asking for proof of a law broken by Government officials?
This one is much ado about nothing...
Meanwhile, the IG’s report contains evidence that the FISA application was a fraud. Does that mean that any and all evidence uncovered by the warrants is inadmissible? Fruit of the poisoned tree?
Do Flynn, Manafort et.al have grounds for dismissal of charges? Restitution? What about all other FISA warrants? Are they frauds also?
We the people want answers. NOW!