Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If I am Trump I put heavy security around Bill Barr
Flopping Aces ^ | 05-05-19 | DrJohn

Posted on 05/05/2019 3:07:05 PM PDT by Starman417

democrats are getting frantic and truly desperate and I really fear for the physical safety of Attorney General Bill Barr. Just now Maria Bartiromo said that her sources tell her that Nadler will introduce a contempt of Congress resolution on Wednesday.

Eric Holder has taught us that such charges may be dismissed summarily and they have no meaning. Obama appointee Judge Amy Berman Jackson declined to hold Holder in contempt. Ater all, Holder was Obama's wing man.

You will remember that no democrat had objections to Holder as Attorney General was acting as Obama's personal attorney but now are offended by such accusations against Barr.

democrats are settting one trap after another for Barr. First they used Barr's appearance before the Senate Judiciary committee to assail him, insult him and impugn his integrity. It was shameful. Then Jerry Nadler demanded that Barr appear before the House Judiciary Committee and Barr agreed. Then after Barr agreed to appear, Nadler changed the rules to allow staff members to put Barr on trial-something entirely unprecedented. Barr then decided against appearing.

Nadler no doubt has calculated Barr would refuse and then started barking about Contempt charges.

Bill Barr is going to unravel the conspiracy against Donald Trump and democrats know it. They know he will expose the false premises upon which the investigations are premised. They know he will get to the bottom of the obama administration spying on Trump and the obama FBI opening a counter intelligence investigation on Americans.

And let's be clear- Barr did not lie.

The mindless, no-need-to-check-the-record allegation against Barr goes like this: The AG testified on April 9 that he had no idea why Special Counsel Mueller was upset over the way Barr’s March 24 letter described Mueller’s report; but, in fact, Barr knew exactly why Mueller was upset because he had received the latter’s March 27 letter complaining about Barr’s missive.

Now, here is the exchange on which the perjury allegation is based, with my italics highlighting key portions:

CRIST: Reports have emerged recently, General, that members of the special counsel’s team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24th letter . . . that it does not adequately or accurately necessarily portray the report’s findings. Do you know what they’re referencing with that?

BARR: No, I don’t. I think — I think . . . I suspect that they probably wanted more put out, but, in my view, I was not interested in putting out summaries or trying to summarize because I think any summary, regardless of who prepares it, not only runs the risk of, you know, being under-inclusive or over-inclusive, but also, you know, would trigger a lot of discussion and analysis that really should await everything coming out at once. So I was not interested in a summary of the report. . . . I felt that I should state the bottom line conclusions and I tried to use Special Counsel Mueller’s own language in doing that.

When we look at the actual words of this exchange, Barr’s testimony is clearly accurate. And I don’t mean accurate in the hyper-technical, Clintonesque “depends on what the definition of is is” sense. I mean straightforward, unguarded, and evincing a willingness to volunteer information beyond what the question sought.

Crist did not ask a general question about Mueller’s reaction to Barr’s letter; he asked a specific question about the reaction of Mueller’s “team” to the Barr letter’s description of “the report’s findings.” Regarding the March 24 letter’s rendering of this bottom line — namely, Russia meddled, Trump did not collude, and Mueller failed to resolve the obstruction question — Barr said he did not know what Mueller’s staff was complaining about.

CNN even went so far as to deceptively alter a video to make Barr appear dishonest.

(Excerpt) Read more at Floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: arkancide; barr; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Starman417

Trump should De-Classify EVERYTHING, Give it to Barr so he has something to hand the committee tomorrow morning, he should bring a Stack of Indictments too.


21 posted on 05/05/2019 4:57:24 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

And unlike Holder, who had Obama Judge not find him in contempt, they will find a Judge to find Barr in contempt.


22 posted on 05/05/2019 5:00:00 PM PDT by Engedi (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
"If I am Trump I put heavy security around Bill Barr"

If I am Trump I would call Erik Prince and have him put heavy security around Bill Barr... The Secret Service (what is the secret?) is, most likely, an untrustworthy tool of the deep state and is incompetent...

23 posted on 05/05/2019 5:19:14 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Julian Assange <<<

His get out of jail free card is “Seth Rich”......but it cant be played till late in the game after the coup perps have taken all the Russian rope....Then it's..Game...Set and Match!

24 posted on 05/05/2019 6:43:41 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Trump needs to release multiple information Bombs! The first being the list of Congress members and Senators who have made payoffs from the sex assault slush fund. Then a few days later start declassifying documents on a wide range of activity’s.


25 posted on 05/05/2019 7:09:04 PM PDT by cquiggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Yes, I definitely would.


26 posted on 05/05/2019 7:19:47 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson