Posted on 04/18/2019 2:17:32 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
Here is what I noticed. From the section on obstruction of justice:
“During the press conference, Trump repeated, “I have nothing to do with Russia” five times. He stated that “the closest [he] came to Russia” was that Russians may have purchased a home or condos from him. He said that after he held the Miss America pageant in Moscow in 2013 he had been interested in working with Russian companies that “wanted to put a lot of money into developments in Russia” but “it never worked out.” He explained, “[f]rankly, I didn’t want to do it for a couple of different reasons. But we had a major developer...that wanted to develop property in Moscow and other places. But we decided not to do it.” The Trump Organization, however, had been pursuing a building project in Moscow - the Trump Tower Moscow project - from approximately September 2015 through June 2016, and the candidate was regularly updated on developments, including possible trips by Michael Cohen to Moscow to promote the deal and by Trump himself to finalize it.”
If self-serving statements made in a press conference count as possible obstruction of justice, then Washington DC needs a prison wall built around the entire damn city!
Guess I missed the part where media hacks are Dept of Justice investigators. Heck, Trump could have claimed to have a schlong 20 feet long at a press conference. So what? Doesn’t make it obstruction of justice if Mueller takes out a tape measure and says it is only 19’ 8”.
The Wikileaks emails were from the DNC and Podesta. The hiLIARy emails that President Trump was mocking the media about are still missing.
That’s the truth not being covered. Disgraceful!
“Also missing: the emails were, in fact, genuine, and actual proof of hillary’s various misdeeds and corruption.”
I bet Bar almost spit when he saw they had added Trump’s tongue-in-cheek quip about maybe Russia could find the missing emails to the official report...shows unadulterated bias and grasping at straws on their part....not professional at all.
Humble's primary objections are to bloggers who only post teasers to generate clicks for their blogs, and those who steal content from other sources and claim it as their own. Free Republic shouldn't be a click farm.
Being mean ,hateful and VILE are not attributes to proud of.
Awww... what's the matter, Spunky?
Diddums get hims little butt hurt?
Go sniff a sausage.
“force freepers to go to your site”
You’d have better luck trying to herd cats.
Take note Jesse!
bump (for use against liberal sister)
Because the FBI/DOJ gave them immunity.
Why hasn’t this been shown as proof that the Mueller report is anti-Trump not a fair investigation. And can someone say who is thee individual who wrote this sentence, which is so clearly false and biased.
What’s the point of redacting that when we all know Roger Stone has been charged. Is it likely to be someone else?
If the wikileaks info started to come out in March why are they up in arms about June and July conversations about what may yet come? Just part of a false narrative.
Exactly. It’s a false narrative. Technically it’s not wrong because he said around the same time. Which means nothing but the impression it gives is that they did it for Trump.
The Mueller report is full of exact dates but here they say “about the same time”. As you said, just to create a misleading impression. It’s not even sequentially correct according to the facts mentioned in the OP.
And while we’re at it, it was Clinton who brought Russia into it when she accused Russia of hacking her server. Trump didn’t insert Russia into the conversation, Clinton did. Trump poked fun at her foibles with his remarks.
Though I admit I don’t know for certain if Trump didn’t mention it before July 26th this post claims that was the first time. In any case, it was Clinton who brought Russia into the conversation first.
But, Mueller does claim Trump campaign first started chattering about it in June, and Mueller claims WikiLeaks first released emails in June but we know that WikiLeaks first put up some of the emails three months prior. So it has to be intentional - or so ridiculously sloppy esp considering Papadopoulos was indicted for getting the date of his Downer meeting wrong.
^ I mean the DNC server.
Though, not sure the timing, it had been speculated that foreign governments accessed her private server too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.