...Bill Barr and I Will Hold Offenders Accountable and Advance the Rule of Law

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^ | March 8, 2019 | Cristina Laila

[Para-Ord.45]

On Friday, Mr. Huber, a US Attorney from Utah, sent a message to Americans — he is committed to holding offenders accountable.

US Attorneys thoroughly enjoyed our time with AG Barr this week. He is a solid, proven leader with a clear vision for the @DOJ. We will move forward with his priorities, hold offenders accountable, and advance the rule of law. pic.twitter.com/cl1ApkgD7o

— U.S. Attorney Huber (@USAttyHuber) March 8, 2019

Here’s what we know so far with the information that is publicly available:

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee say John Huber still has not interviewed key witnesses and they want answers.

Mark Meadows (R-NC), Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Doug Collins (R-GA) sent a letter to special prosecutor John Huber on January 8th demanding answers by a January 21st deadline.

“Your investigation has been ongoing for over nine months. During the course of our extensive investigation we have interviewed more than a dozen current and former DOJ and FBI personnel, and were surprised to hear none of these potentially informative witnesses testified to speaking with you,” the GOP lawmakers wrote.

The Republican Congressmen then blasted Huber for being a no-show at the December hearing where Clinton Foundation whistleblowers Lawrence Doyle of DM Income Advisors and John Moynihan of JFM Associates testified.

“Further, last month, then-chairman Mark Meadows invited you to testify as a witness at the Subcommittee on Government Operations’ hearing ‘Oversight of Nonprofit Organizations: A Case Study on the Clinton Foundation.’ We were disappointed to learn from the department that you were not enthusiastic about testifying when declining the invitation.”

[Para-Ord.45]

Huber was only tasked to file a report/recommendations. It has been sixteen months since that letter, so we can assume Huber did not identify a single thing:

[philman_36]

...so we can assume Huber did not identify a single thing:

You can assume anything you want. Don't include me in your "we".

Aside...speaking of letters, you may find this interesting...#14.

Personally, I found it hilarious.

[bagster]

How’s granny?

[Para-Ord.45]

Facts are facts and not assumptions.

-Huber was assigned on Nov. 22, 2017.
-The first issue was Clinton.
-Result of Huber/Horowitz IG report? No criminal referrals.
-No special counsel.

[philman_36]

Facts are facts and not assumptions.

Yet you stated "we" can assume things.

...so we can assume Huber did not identify a single thing:
When one assumes one makes an assumption, right?

You said it, not me.

There are some interesting synonyms to assume (to take as true or as a fact without actual proof).

[Para-Ord.45]

And I then specified with facts:

-Huber was assigned on Nov. 22, 2017.
-The first issue was Clinton.
-Result of Huber/Horowitz IG report? No criminal referrals.
-No special counsel.
-REPEAT, no criminal referrals, no indictments, no grand jury, no convictions.

[philman_36]

No criminal referrals.
...no criminal referrals, no indictments, no grand jury, no convictions.
Facts or assumptions on your part?

Show me, don't tell me.

Oh, wait! Don't you have to wait just like everyone else for a report to come out to verify the things that you state as fact are actually facts and in the interim it leaves you free to make assumptions and claim those assumptions are facts?

[philman_36]

Plaintiff’s dissatisfaction with the results of the search it requested is not a reason to conduct additional searches outside the scope of its request.

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL
https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

[philman_36]

The OIG report, June 2018. What about it?

[philman_36]

Isn't that report about what happened in the previous administration
and not about what is happening in the current administration?

[philman_36]

House Republicans ask US attorney for update on DOJ review of FBI’s Clinton, Russia investigations January 07, 2019
The Justice Department’s IG has already investigated and released a report on how the Clinton probe was handled by the department and FBI and is already also reviewing the Russia investigation.

Just in case you needed some evidence instead of an assumption.

...and is already also reviewing the Russia investigation.
That report should be interesting reading as well...when it comes out.

[bagster]

You're shredding this guy, Philman.

I can't watch.

#TheCarnage

[philman_36]

You see that other reply I pinged you to? (see 102 this thread for link)

You're shredding this guy, Philman.

I'm playing nice with others...for the most part.

[Para-Ord.45]

LOL

Your link refers to issues in THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION.

KNOW WHEN TO WALK AWAY QTIP.

[philman_36]

Your link refers to issues in THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION.

LOL
SO DOES YOURS!

[Para-Ord.45]

“Isn’t that report about what happened in the previous administration
and not about what is happening in the current administration? “

Nobody cares about Mueller`s report. Since Trump is not a Russian spy and Putin did not hack the elections it’ll be a dud and will not, as Qtards insist, come back implicating Hillary, Obama, Clapper, Brennan, etal.

[philman_36]

You're just an assumption machine, aren't you!

[Para-Ord.45]

So Trump is a Russian spy and Putin hacked the election.

Its one or the other and logical minds can deduct, unlike Qtards who take their marchers orders from a child-porn chan site and an anonymous poster.

[sport]

I will believe it when I see Hillary wearing handcuffs.